Examples of using Joint implementation supervisory in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
A new Director of the Sustainable Development Programme joined the secretariat in September 2008, to oversee the secretariat ' s support to the Executive Board and the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee.
Whenever, in the judgment of the Chair, a decision must be taken by the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee which cannot be postponed until the next meeting of the Committee, the Chair shall transmit to each member a proposed decision, with an invitation to approve the decision by consensus.
Notes that the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee is seeking to elaborate modalities and procedures for the implementation of Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol, which may have implications for the procedures and mechanisms relating to compliance under the Kyoto Protocol, contained in the annex to decision 27/CMP.1;
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to submit elaborated recommendations on the accreditation system for joint implementation aligned with that of the clean development mechanism, taking into consideration decision 6/CMP.8,
Encourages the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to continue enhancing the implementation of the verification procedure under the Committee, taking into account the distinct characteristics of joint implementation under Article 6 of the Kyoto Protocol, and to emphasize in its interaction with designated focal points, independent entities, project participants and stakeholders, that approaches specific to joint implementation are available;
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to develop, as soon as possible, definitions, forms, guidelines and procedures for projects under programmes of activities implemented under the verification procedure under the Committee, bearing in mind the work of the Executive Board of the clean development mechanism in this area;
Also requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to make further recommendations to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its seventh session on amendments to the fee structure including, inter alia, the introduction of a fixed annual fee payable by host Parties.
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to report to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its sixth session on a financial and budget projection up to 2012, including an analysis of when and under which conditions the committee will become self-financing;
of the Kyoto Protocol, or any other confidential information coming to my knowledge by reason of my duties for the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee.
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee to emphasize its executive and supervisory role, including by establishing or strengthening its support structure as necessary, including relevant subcommittees, panels and/or working groups, accredited independent entities and the secretariat servicing the system;
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee, with the assistance of the secretariat, to report annually to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol on the revenue received by the secretariat from the charging of fees to cover administrative costs relating to the activities of the Committee, with a view to reviewing these arrangements as necessary;
Notes with appreciation that the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee has prepared financial and budget projections up to 2012, including an analysis of under which conditions the Committee will become self-financing, as part of the report referred to in paragraph 24 above;
At its seventeenth meeting, the JISC, following the recommendation by the JI-AP, adopted" Procedure for accrediting independent entities by the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee(version 05)", introducing/revising provisions to strengthen the monitoring of performance of AIEs and streamline some assessment steps.
The main role of the Sustainable Development Mechanisms(SDM) programme during the reporting period continues to be the provision of support to the two bodies constituted to supervise the implementation of the project-based mechanisms under the Kyoto Protocol, namely the CDM Executive Board and the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee(JISC).
C If the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee follows the same remuneration practice(subject to a COP/MOP decision) and travel arrangement for its members/alternate members as
Authorizes the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee, taking into account experience gained, to make any amendments
Acknowledges with appreciation that the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee has kept its regulatory documents under review and continues to improve the clarity of the provisions and guidelines established regarding the verification procedure under the Committee, setting time limits in the joint implementation project cycle, making use of electronic decision-making, in particular in relation to reviews, and encouraging and supporting project-based innovative methodological approaches;
Requests the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee, with a view to it reporting to the Conference of the Parties serving as the meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol at its third session, to keep the joint implementation management plan under review and make adjustments as necessary to continue ensuring the efficient, cost-effective and transparent functioning of the Committee and related activities on joint implementation by, inter alia.
Notes the information provided by the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee regarding the recommended revision to the provisions for the charging of fees to cover administrative costs relating to the activities of the Committee, incorporating preferential treatment of joint implementation small-scale projects with regard to advance payments on the fee for processing of verification reports, as contained in annex I to document FCCC/KP/CMP/2007/4(Part I);
Procedure for accrediting independent entities by the Joint Implementation Supervisory Committee(version 04)", modifying, inter alia, the accreditation term from three to five years, and the timing of witnessing activities, allowing for accreditation for all sectoral scopes applied for upon successful completion of a single witnessing activity, subject to subsequent confirmation of accreditation through successful completion of an ex-post witnessing activity for each sectoral group that has not been witnessed;