Examples of using Framework decisions in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
Specific legislative instruments(Common Positions, Framework Decisions, Decisions and Conventions)
The Commission urges all those Member States that have not yet done so to take swift measures to implement these Framework Decisions to the fullest extent.
The proposal, which replaces Joint Action 98/699/JHA and, in part, Framework Decisions 2001/500/JHA1 and 2005/212/JHA2.
It is in this spirit that the EU adopted in 2008 and 2009 three complementary Framework Decisions whose respective transposition deadlines have expired.
the Commission has to apply both directives and framework decisions in this field.
The report examines the implementation of three separate EU Framework Decisions covering(1) the transfer of prisoners,(2)
One of the new aspects of the Framework Decisions is that they impose in principle an obligation to accept requests for transfer.
Certain Framework Decisions which provide for differing deadlines for implementation are covered by successive reports e.g. the crime victims Framework Decision. .
It extends beyond Directives and Framework Decisions to include legislative instruments that have been followed up in Member States with a deadline for application
This comes from the principle of mutual recognition upon which the Framework Decisions are based and is reflected in the provision common to the Framework Decisions that the executing State shall recognise a judgment which has been forwarded by the issuing State.
Eurojust) will be triggered, since the Framework Decisions falls within their scope.
not to apply a ground for refusal taking into account the social rehabilitation aspect which underpins all three Framework Decisions.
The efforts of the Member States that implemented the Framework Decisions in time should be underlined and the comments relating to those Member States should be understood in the light of the approach of the Commission to provide assistance in the implementation process.
The Commission does not currently have the powers to launch infringement proceedings under Article 258 TFEU with regard to Framework Decisions adopted prior to the entry into force of the Treaty of Lisbon see Article 10(1) of Protocol No 36 to the Treaties.
The non-implementation of the Framework Decisions by some Member States is very problematic since those Member States who have properly implemented the Framework Decisions cannot benefit from their co-operation provisions in their relations with those Member States who did not implement them in time.
One common factor is that the Member States are required to transpose the measures provided for by Directives or Framework Decisions and to notify the Commission or, in certain cases,
some general criteria have been developed with respect to directives which should be applied mutatis mutandis to framework decisions.
Framework Decisions as legal instruments can best be compared to a directive,
The late or incomplete implementation by several Member States is particularly regrettable as the Framework Decisions have the potential to lead to a reduction in prison sentences imposed by judges on non-residents.
Paragraph 1 sets the minimum penalty incurred for offences connected with participation in a criminal organisation in accordance with the“minimum maximum” method used hitherto in framework decisions. For directing a criminal organisation, the maximum term of imprisonment may not be less than ten years.