Примеры использования River uruguay на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Argentina chose Raúl Emilio Vinuesa
both the CMB mill, whose construction on the River Uruguay was ultimately abandoned,
rights in the management of the River Uruguay and in the protection of its environment.
As far as the procedural violations are concerned, the Court noted that Uruguay had not informed the Administrative Commission of the River Uruguay of the projects as prescribed in the Statute.
In the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Argentina chose Mr. Raúl Emilio Vinuesa
The International Court of Justice had previously placed the burden of proof on the applicant in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment of 20 April 2010, paragraph 162.
In its Judgment in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case, the ICJ illustrates the meaning of a specific treaty obligation that it had qualified as"an obligation to act with due diligence" as follows.
In its application, Argentina charged the Government of Uruguay with having unilaterally authorized the construction of two pulp mills on the River Uruguay without complying with the obligatory prior notification
Finds that the Eastern Republic of Uruguay has breached its procedural obligations under Articles 7 to 12 of the 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay and that the declaration by the Court of this breach constitutes appropriate satisfaction;
breached its substantive obligations, aiming at environmental protection, under the statute of the River Uruguay by authorizing the construction and commissioning of the Orion(Botnia) plant.
on 20 April 2010, when the Court rendered its judgment in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
content of an environmental impact assessment was also the subject of consideration by the International Court of Justice in 2010 in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) judgment.
were referred to by the International Court of Justice in its judgment in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
since 6 February 2009; Acting President in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) and in Whaling in
such as the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) and the case concerning
Argentina alleges that Uruguay unilaterally authorized the construction of the two pulp mills in violation of the obligations of the 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay, a treaty signed by the two States for"the optimum and rational utilization" of the river.
In the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case, which primarily concerned the river's water quality,
In the recent judgment of the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case(Argentina- Uruguay) rendered on 20 April 2010,