Примери за използване на Wikipedia's на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Today, people see Wikipedia's 22 million articles, and they think everything has already been written about.
Jimbo and many others in Wikipedia's hierarchy have made thier[sic] support known as well…[23].
Inventor Jack Andraka used Wikipedia's science articles to develop a prototype for a potential breakthrough method of cancer screening before his 17th birthday.
Wikipedia's policies have also allowed for the use of some very suspect"reliable" secondary sources.
Wikipedia's content is contributed
Although Wikipedia's articles are neutral, its existence is not”,
Wikipedia's digital backbone is like the highly protected
Even a cursory search of Wikipedia's List of Lists of Lists reveals nothing musical(and makes our heads hurt).
The changes may violate Wikipedia's conflict-of-interest guidelines, a spokeswoman for the site said on Thursday.
Wikipedia's policy against original research,
Wikipedia's policy on biographies of living persons requires exercising special care in presenting negative viewpoints about living persons.
regarding Wikipedia's nonbias policy, followed by replies.
Given the complexity of verifying the legitimacy of Wikipedia's 5.6 million English articles, verifying that all its editors don't have a conflict of interest is impractical.
You will also notice that aside from Google's own entry and Wikipedia's definition, the other results are all SEO companies.
it is not Wikipedia's purpose to include a lengthy or comprehensive list of external links related to each topic.
But this year is a little more incredible than most because this year we celebrate Wikipedia's tenth anniversary.
Currently, only 0.1% of English Wikipedia's 5 million articles have video.
Numerous people have sought to improve Wikipedia's article on homeopathy, but they have been blocked or prohibited from editing the article.
the rest of the Wikimedia Foundation Board, I have increasingly begun to think of Wikipedia's public voice, and the goodwill people have for Wikipedia, as a resource that wants to be used for the benefit of the public.