Dynamic languages, database servers, and other tools distributed with Red Hat Software Collections do not replace the default system tools provided with Red Hat Enterprise Linux, nor are they used in preference to these tools.
If you have previous experience with statically typed languages such as C, C++, or C but never used a dynamically typed one before, it is advised you read this tutorial: GDScript: An introduction to dynamic languages.
According to Greg Young, the discussion on static vs dynamic languages should also take into consideration“the concept of static verification of more than just types” and he talks about opportunities offered by design by contract approach.
動的言語は安全ではない:。
Dynamic Languages are not safe.
多言語対応の改善。動的言語選択。
Multi-language improvements, dynamic language selection.
一方でElixirは結局のところ動的言語です。
In the other hand, Elixir is still dynamic language.
動的言語の多くには、開発者に次の利点があります。
Most dynamic languages provide the following advantages for developers.
PHPは柔軟性のある動的言語で、いろんなプログラミングテクニックに対応している。
PHP is a flexible, dynamic language that supports a variety of programming techniques.
Most dynamic languages don't have particularly rigorous specifications, and the JVM implementation often differs in undocumented ways from the C implementation.
This is meant to reflect the idea that we would eventually like other languages to use Parrot as their VM; in a sense, we would like Parrot to become a"common language runtime" for dynamic languages.
English
中文
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Bahasa indonesia
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt