Examples of using Net remuneration margin in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The Committee may consider recommending that the net remuneration margin between the United Nations and its comparator be maintained at least at a level around the desirable midpoint of 115 over a five-year period, as recommended by the General Assembly.
The Commission was informed that the net remuneration margin for 2005 had been estimated at 111.1 on the basis of the approved methodology and existing grade equivalencies between United Nations and United States officials in comparable positions.
With regard to the Commission ' s recommendation to restore the net remuneration margin to the desirable mid-point of 115 in 1996, he recalled that in its resolution 40/244 the General Assembly had approved the range of 110 to 120 with a desirable mid-point of 115.
The Commission was informed that the net remuneration margin for 2000 was estimated at 113.8 on the basis of the approved methodology and currently existing grade equivalencies between United Nations and United States officials in comparable positions.
It further observed that the resulting net remuneration margin would remain within the established range and the five-year average of the margin would be just below the desirable midpoint of 115.
The Commission was informed that the net remuneration margin for 2002 was estimated at 109.3 on the basis of the approved methodology and existing grade equivalencies between United Nations and United States officials in comparable positions.
The Commission noted that, on the basis of the approved methodology and the available information as at the end of April 2001, the net remuneration margin for 2001 was estimated at 112.2.
The Commission noted that, on the basis of the approved methodology and the available information as at the beginning of July 2005, the net remuneration margin for 2005 had been estimated at 111.1.
It considered that, since the job classification systems of both the comparator and the common system had not substantially changed since the previous equivalency study, it would not be expected that the net remuneration margin would change significantly.
United Nations staff members are especially concerned about the widening net remuneration margin between the United Nations and its present comparator, the federal civil service of the United States of America.
That procedure had been developed by a consultant for use in calculating the net remuneration margin between the salaries of the United States federal civil service in Washington and those of the United Nations common system in New York.
With respect to the evolution of the United Nations/United States net remuneration margin and the base/floor salary scale, the Federation noted that the margin for 2008 had been estimated at 114.1, with its five-year average(2004-2008) standing at 112.8.
It was observed that over recent years, the net remuneration margin was gradually increasing and that, presently, both its calendar year level and the five-year average were close to the desirable midpoint of 115.
The Commission should make further recommendations for rectifying the current imbalances in the net remuneration margin at the D-1/D-2 grades, which would ensure competitiveness and avoid distortions in the margins of remuneration at the entry levels.
The Commission was informed that the net remuneration margin for 2001 was estimated at 112.2 on the basis of the approved methodology and the current grade equivalencies between United Nations and United States officials in comparable positions.
The net remuneration margin for 2005 between United Nations officials in the Professional and higher categories and United States federal civil service employees in comparable positions had been estimated at 111.1 on the basis of the approved methodology and existing grade equivalencies.
These procedures have continued to produce the desired results as shown by the United Nations/United States net remuneration margin figures for the last 10 years(1987- 1997)(see annex VII).
The Commission was informed that the net remuneration margin for 2004 had been estimated at 110.3 on the basis of the approved methodology and existing grade equivalencies between United Nations and United States officials in comparable positions.
With respect to the development of the United Nations/United States net remuneration margin, the Group would need to see the updated figures for December 2013 and those projected for February 2014 in order to better assess the situation.
Decides that the net remuneration margin methodology without the modifications in paragraph 119(b)(ii) and(iii) of the twenty-first annual report of the International Civil Service Commission6 should continue to apply;