Examples of using Claim under article in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Committee observes that the complainant does not substantiate his claim under article 1 and does not refute the State party's arguments in this regard.
In this respect, therefore, the author has no claim under article 2 of the Optional Protocol.
Accordingly, the Committee finds that the author has failed to substantiate her claim under article 2 of the Optional Protocol in this regard" see annex X,
the Committee considered that the authors had no claim under article 3 of the Optional Protocol,
Accordingly it declares the communication admissible with regard to this claim under article 14(1) of the Covenant and proceeds immediately to the consideration of its merits.
The Court allowed the claim under article 53 CISG because the outstanding purchase price was due under article 58 CISG.
The State party argues therefore that the authors have no claim under article 2 of the Optional Protocol
As the complainant has not substantiated his claim under article 3, his removal to his country of origin was not in breach of that provision.
In one case a court refused a claim under article 74 because the buyer had failed to avoid the contract before making a cover sale.13 4.
the reservation being invalid, the Committee is not precluded from examining their claim under article 26.
However, the information provided by the author has not been sufficient to substantiate his claim under article 14.
the State party argues that his claim under article 26 is inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
The Committee considers that the author has sufficiently substantiated his claim under article 21 of the Covenant, for purposes of admissibility.
author has sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, his claim under article 21 of the Covenant.
In the circumstances, the Committee considers that the author has failed to substantiate his claim under article 14 of the Covenant,
Turning to the subsidiary claim under article 2, the State party argues that the claim under article 2 is incompatible with the Covenant
The Committee considers that the author has sufficiently substantiated his claim under article 19 of the Covenant, for purposes of admissibility,
So far as concerns the claim under article 18, the State party contests the claim of the third
and declared their claim under article 1 of Protocol 1 of the European Convention inadmissible ratione materiae.
With regard to his claim under article 7, the author claimed that he could not provide information relating to his personal situation in China, as he had been in the Netherlands since 2004.