Examples of using Declared the communication in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
On 16 March 1995, therefore, the Committee declared the communication admissible insofar as it appeared to raise issues under articles 7
Accordingly, on 14 October 1997, the Committee declared the communication admissible as far as it raised issues under articles 6,
On 24 July 1989, the Committee declared the communication admissible in so far as it appeared to raise issues under articles 7,
On 22 March 1991, the Human Rights Committee declared the communication admissible inasmuch as it might raise issues under articles 10,
Accordingly, the Committee declared the communication admissible and requested the State party to provide its observations on the merits of the case.
It therefore declared the communication admissible insofar as it raised issues under articles 25
It therefore declared the communication inadmissible under article 27(1)(b)(now article 35(2)(b)).13.
On 16 October 1992, the Committee declared the communication admissible in so far as it might raise issues under articles 7 and 10 of the Covenant.
Since the authors alleged that the continuous application of a law discriminated against them, the Committee declared the communication admissible.
On 9 July 1991, the Committee, accordingly, declared the communication admissible in as much as it might raise issues under articles 7,
On 30 June 1994, therefore, the Committee declared the communication admissible inasmuch as it appeared to raise issues under article 9,
On 21 July 1995, therefore, the Human Rights Committee declared the communication admissible in as much as it appeared to raise issues under article 14,
On 11 October 1994, therefore, the Committee declared the communication admissible insofar as it appeared to raise issues under article 6,
Accordingly, on 14 October 1997, the Committee declared the communication admissible insofar as it appeared to raise issues under articles 7,
of the Convention had been sufficiently substantiated, for purposes of admissibility, and declared the communication admissible on 28 July 2009.
For the above reasons, we are of the opinion that the Committee should have declared the communication Loth v. Germany to be admissible, without prejudice to a decision on the alleged violation of article 26 of the Covenant by the State party.
On 16 October 1992, the Committee declared the communication admissible in so far as it appeared to raise issues under articles 6,
Committee on 7 July 1998, the Committee declared the communication admissible without specifying what were the articles of the Covenant which appeared to have been violated.