Examples of using TRI data in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
including detailed analyses and breakdowns of the TRI data.
In conclusion, most companies are using TRI data in their environmental reports to establish baselines,
TRI data show that production-related waste is expected to increase less,
called the TRI data, documents that gold mines were the largest source of mercury emissions in the tri-state region of Utah, Idaho and Nevada.
the NPRI data set of May 2006, the TRI data set of March 2006
The data for 2004 were received from the three governments as follows: TRI data from the US EPA released to the public in March 2006;
the lack of an EPA strategy for assessing the informational needs of different sectors of the public hampers the goal of ensuring public access to TRI data.
Because of the large size of the TRI data set, North American percentages were close to or the same as TRI percentages-40 percent for on-site releases,
Multiple SIC codes reported only in TRI data.
Public Access to US TRI Data and Information 11.
Table 4-1 presents summary NPRI and TRI data for this matched data set.
Chapter 4 then draws comparisons from the matched NPRI/TRI data set.
Similarly, only TRI data is shown when there is no Superfund site data. .
Frequently, with the aid of TRI data, companies tracked their progress back to 1987 or 1988.
Reported as“.” in TRI data which indicates that the facility left that cell blank in its submission.
but not with TRI data.
for Internet access 202-234-8570 for free on-line access to TRI data, or 202-234-8494 for information.
This is essential for comparing NPRI and TRI data because otherwise there is no direct correspondence between the two SIC code systems.
However, the matched NPRI and TRI data do not include municipal incinerators, which are often a significant source of mercury emissions.
This is essential to comparing the NPRI and TRI data, because there is no direct correspondence between the two SIC code systems.