Examples of using Accelerationism in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
What would you say sets accelerationism apart from similar theories?
The second aim is to ask what accelerationism could mean now, whether it is or could be a coherent theoretical
For me one of the interesting things about the emergence of accelerationism has been a revival of interest in the work of the CCRU
That's accelerationism, the political question of futurality,
social theory, accelerationism is the idea that the prevailing system of capitalism should be expanded
have all been hugely influential to the political philosophy of accelerationism.
Tiziana Terranova's"Red Stack Attack!" links Bratton's stack model and left accelerationism.
Roc Jiménez de Cisneros My initial reaction when I first started reading about accelerationism was that it is all about context: to a certain extent, what makes accelerationism radical-sounding is the fact that it is coming from the left.
To a certain extent(and apologies for the kinda clumsy analogy), accelerationism makes me think of the use of toxins in vaccines,
Neither of these viewpoints are concerned with the‘contradictions of capitalism'- there's an erroneous view that accelerationism is about a Marxist‘acceleration of contradictions', which in fact none of these authors advocate.
has a lot to recommend it, but contemporary accelerationism has had to reconsider its aestheticising tendency
But here lies the whole question of accelerationism as a politics: If what we want to do is to tap into future intelligence, bringing it to bear on the present,
The various schools of accelerationism argue that protest, quasi-Luddite slowing down,
a collection of essays that brings together the discursive lines of Speculative Realism, contemporary art and accelerationism.
Benjamin H. Bratton's book The Stack: On Software and Sovereignty is associated with accelerationism.
However, I don't think accelerationism, or Prometheanism, is necessarily synonymous with this recklessness-at least,
In some of the more recent writings on accelerationism, and in particular Williams'
That's right, certainly in those earlier moments of accelerationism the theoretical questions being addressed went along with a stylistic
This already changes the stakes of accelerationism, since it means that one can't adopt a simple means-end view on things:
because no apology is necessary- that the point of publishing the book and bringing the question of accelerationism to the foreground isn't at all to introduce people to some kind of unified position or‘movement',