Examples of using Significant cross-border in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
existing EIB financing instruments, while achieving significant cross-border European added value in the implementation of the selected projects
As well as continuing to examine charging methodologies, the committee should begin reviewing char ging practices with potentially significant cross-border impacts.
as far as possible in quantitative- terms whether there is a significant cross-border problem.
At the same time, some cases notifiable in only one or two Member States might have significant cross-border effects and would not be caught.
In a similar vein, the Community is likely to be the most appropriate level for policy action whenever a problem involves significant cross-border effects between a large number of Member States.
A recent example of a case with significant cross-border impact that failed to meet the Article 1 requirements owing to the 2/3 rule was the concentration between the Chase Manhattan Corporation and Robert Flemmings Holdings Limited.
with other Member States if significant cross-border effects are likely.
for many transactions with significant cross-border effects, provide a one-stop shop merger control.
which still had a significant cross-border impact did not benefit from the one-stop shop principle.
including significant cross-border effects.
where all transactions with a significant cross-border effect were to be treated under the Community rules would have a significant impact on the Commission's resources17.
that the unilateral measures adopted by some Member States to address the situation have a significant cross-border impact and destabilising effects.
which are likely to have a significant cross-border impact.
The fact that most of the mergers that fulfil the existing turnover requirements have significant cross-border effects cannot, however, provide an answer to the question whether the existing thresholds catch all(or even most)
Whereas a majority(65%) of the respondents have replied that this is the case, a large proportion of the respondents believe that many transactions that have a significant cross-border impact are excluded from the one-stop shop principle owing to the 2/3 rule.
There is a general view that the current turnover thresholds of Article 1 do not allow the business community the full benefit of these guiding principles in the sense that a substantial number of deals with significant cross-border effects remain subject to multiple national control.
the Committee Opinion on the Green Paper noted that"there are no reasons for limiting the definition of significant cross-border effects and thus the concept of"Community dimension" to cases involving a minimum of three Member States.
by being located on the territory of one Member State and having a significant cross-border impact as set out in point 1 of Annex IV;
have as a result that an important number of transactions with significant cross-border effects, and therefore a Community interest,
In line with the objective of facilitating the referral of cases which, due to a lack of significant cross-border effects, would be most appropriately assessed at national level,