Примеры использования Krill biomass на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
These functional relationships empirically demonstrate reduced penguin performance in the Antarctic Peninsula region when local krill biomass is low or when local krill catches are high relative to local biomass. .
The trigger level has remained the same despite significant increased estimates for krill biomass B0 and allowable catch in Area 48 during recent years increasing allowable catch from 4 million tonnes to 5.61 million tonnes.
The Working Group agreed that current levels of catches are not observed to cause a trend in krill biomass and noted that the paper's comparison of catch
not throughout the fishing season, but krill biomass in the survey area would be significantly changed by flux over the fishing season.
as well as specific CCAMLR study requirements e.g. krill biomass estimates.
The authors compared these direct effects of climate-driven changes in temperature on krill biomass and predator performance to models with the addition of fishing where both biomass
SG-ASAM recommended continued investigation into the diel variability in krill biomass- caused either by variations in TS with tilt angle
This method quantifies how, during several years of fishing, the local harvest rate might increase the chances that local krill biomass is less than a critical level which is needed for krill-dependent predators to be successful.
each subarea(48.1 to 48.3) but generally detect substantially more krill biomass than would be taken if the relevant subarea catch limits specified in CM 51-07 were to be achieved.
The Working Group noted that the time series of krill biomass from Subareas 48.1 and 48.3(WG-EMM-14/35 and 14/P04 respectively)
She also noted that knowing the critical density thresholds of krill for foraging predators would also provide management information for understanding reproductive success for different predators in relation to annual estimates of variability in krill biomass.
outcomes of climate change in relation to krill biomass, are already considered in the current work(i)
Comparison of the annual FPI with the krill biomass(from research surveys) and the combined standardised indices(CSIs)
Some participants considered that the critical level could be determined by estimating functional relationships between predator success and krill biomass using available data from joint monitoring studies of predators
The analysis suggested that there is sufficient signal in existing CEMP indices to detect reduced predator performance when krill biomass is low or when local harvest
The Working Group noted that the detection of predators in the acoustic data used to estimate krill biomass may potentially provide a means to study the relationship between at-sea density of krill predators
In the first model, a krill biomass series was specified on the basis of the calendar(i.e. a series that explicitly describes a step-change)
suggesting that catch density within hotspots can index krill biomass in a given area.
the Subgroup concluded that it should not change the default values currently in place when calculating krill biomass.
Krill biomass was an order of magnitude higher(~5 500 000 tonnes in 2014)