Примеры использования Nuclear posture на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
the Russian Federation and recent Nuclear Posture Review issued by the United States.
such as the United States Nuclear Posture Review and the NATO Strategic Concept, was deeply worrying.
For example, we thought that something positive would emerge when the United States of America decided to conduct a nuclear posture review in October 1993.
Pursuant to the nuclear posture review, we seek to rely less and less on nuclear weapons for strategic deterrence.
two NATO Partnership for Peace nations that are generally not involved in NATO's nuclear posture.
As a first step, a real change is needed regarding the aggressive Nuclear Posture Review of the United States
As announced in the Nuclear Posture Review of 2001,posture..">
The United States is now conducting the follow-on analysis called for in the 2010 Nuclear Posture Review to set goals for future nuclear reductions in line with strategic requirements.
The 2001 Nuclear Posture Review had merely identified shortfalls in capabilities where new conventional
The 2010 United States Nuclear Posture Review outlined the United States Administration's approach to reducing nuclear dangers
It was precisely the new thinking embodied in the Nuclear Posture Review that allowed for the historic reductions we are continuing today.
As announced in the Nuclear Posture Review of 2001, the United States is moving away from the cold war
The Nuclear Posture Review by a nuclear-weapon State deviated from the security assurances under the NPT.
Belarus deeply regretted the recently announced nuclear posture review, which envisaged the development of new types of nuclear weapons.
High alert levels and their related nuclear posture are based on the maintenance of"prompt launch" capabilities.
does not recommend any changes to NATO's nuclear posture.
While reducing our nuclear stockpile we have introduced concrete changes to our national nuclear posture that have reduced our reliance on nuclear weapons.
In October 1993 the United States announced that it would undertake a nuclear posture review that would incorporate policy and doctrine revisions.
Concerning modernization, let me reiterate in the clearest terms that the Nuclear Posture Review has ruled out the development of new United States nuclear warheads
In this regard, we commend the Nuclear Posture Review of the United States