Примеры использования Warrant case на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
there was insufficient relevant practice and jurisprudence and, in the Arrest Warrant case, some judges of the International Court of Justice had expressed divergent opinions on the matter,
As the International Court of Justice had shown in the Arrest Warrant case, a person who was no longer Head of State,
In recent years, the Pinochet cases, the Arrest Warrant case and the Djibouti v. France case have drawn particular interest to this area of the law,
The paucity of information on practice, including court rulings on the question of immunity of ministers for foreign affairs, led Judge Van den Wyngaert to state, in his dissenting opinion in the Arrest Warrant case, that"There is no evidence for the proposition that a State is under an obligation to grant immunity from criminal process to an incumbent Foreign Minister under customary international law.
she noted that in the Arrest Warrant case, the International Court of Justice had advised States to consider the consequences should other States follow their lead in attempting to steer public international law in a direction conflicting with the principles that governed contemporary international relations.
reference was made to the Arrest Warrant case and the case concerning Certain Questions of Mutual Assistance,
In the Arrest Warrant case, the International Court of Justice had found no reason to deduce that there existed under customary international law any form of exception to the rule according immunity from criminal jurisdiction
supported the decision to adopt the language of the International Court of Justice in the Arrest Warrant case, by using the phrase"whether in a private
as reflected in the Judgment of the International Court of Justice in the Arrest Warrant case.
Special Rapporteur to work on the basis of existing international law and agreed with the view that the decision of the International Court of Justice in the Arrest Warrant case was a sound basis on which to proceed.
In its judgment in the Arrest Warrant case, the International Court of Justice stated its opinion most definitely on the issue of whether the conclusion by States of an international treaty criminalizing certain actions and requiring States to extend criminal jurisdiction to them meant that
It was argued by some members, however, that the International Court of Justice's finding, in the Arrest Warrant case, that such immunity was enjoyed by ministers for foreign affairs did not have a firm basis in customary international law as was explained in the dissenting opinions in that case. .
Although the International Court of Justice in the Arrest Warrant case had found that the immunity of a serving minister for foreign affairs was absolute while he
was inclined to believe that the phrase"such as" as applied to persons included in the troika in the Arrest Warrant case meant that there should be an unrestricted list under international law.
maintaining a restriction on the troika, some other members pointed to the possibility of broadening the scope beyond the troika, on account of the dicta in the Arrest Warrant case, to a narrow circle of high-ranking holders of office in a State.
In her dissenting opinion in the Arrest Warrant case, Judge ad hoc Van den Wyngaert,
While the judgment of the International Court of Justice in Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2001(Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)(the Arrest Warrant case) offered clear authority that those officials enjoyed immunity ratione personae,
Referring to the Arrest Warrant case, where the Court found that the"mere issu[ance of an arrest warrant] violated the immunity" of the State official in question,
In its judgment in the case concerning the Arrest Warrant of 11 April 2000(Democratic Republic of the Congo v. Belgium)(the Arrest Warrant case), the International Court of Justice had expressly stated that in international law it was firmly established that certain holders of high-ranking office in a State,
Arrest Warrant case ran against the general trend towards the condemnation of certain crimes by the international community as a whole(as exemplified by the position of the Appeals Chamber of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia in the Blaškić case),