Примери за използване на To what is strictly necessary на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
the lack of safeguards aimed at limiting to what was strictly necessary the interference with the rights enshrined in Articles 7 and 8 of the Charter.
the lack of a safeguard in relation to access aimed at reducing the interference to what was strictly necessary.
without that interference being limited to what was strictly necessary.
Be limited to what is strictly necessary.
Procedures at green lane border crossings should be minimised and streamlined to what is strictly necessary.
No tests spread across different levels are stipulated and requirements are not lowered to what is strictly necessary.
They must confine themselves to what is strictly necessary to ensure the protection of consumers/passengers.
Because their wording is too general, the implementation of those derogations by the United States authorities is not limited to what is strictly necessary.
It must limit the severity of all the penalties imposed to what is strictly necessary in relation to the seriousness of the offence concerned.
the implementation of those derogations by the United States authorities is not limited to what is strictly necessary.
Such safeguard measures shall be restricted with regard to their scope and duration to what is strictly necessary in order to remedy the situation.
(82) Such an interference must, according to the Court, be‘precisely circumscribed by provisions to ensure that it is actually limited to what is strictly necessary'.
The Directive's"wide-ranging and particularly serious interference" with the fundamental rights is insufficiently circumscribed to ensure that the interference is actually limited to what is strictly necessary.
We limit our use of data for anti-fraud purposes to what is strictly necessary and within the recognized limits of our legitimate interests to protect our customers and services.
Border control should be targeted and limited in scope, frequency, location and time, to what is strictly necessary to respond to the serious threat and to safeguard public policy
the Court established minimum safeguards that must all be present under the national regime in question so as to limit the interference with fundamental rights to what is strictly necessary.
thereby ensuring that such a measure is limited to what is strictly necessary”§109().
Since the interferences which the envisaged agreement entails are not all limited to what is strictly necessary and are therefore not entirely justified, the Court concludes that the envisaged agreement may not be concluded in its current form.”.
which is not sufficiently circumscribed“to ensure that that interference is actually limited to what is strictly necessary.”.
thereby ensuring that such a measure is limited to what is strictly necessary”.