The Mission' s framework on the military component reflects support to the compliance with the 1994 Moscow Agreement on Ceasefire and Separation of Forces.
月29日,格鲁吉亚宣布1994年《莫斯科协定》无效。
On 29 August, the Government of Georgia declared that the 1994 Moscow Agreement was null and void.
Violations of the Moscow Agreementof 1994, in the form of denial of access to patrols and deployment of prohibited weapons, continue despite protests by UNOMIG.
While the differences that have surfaced with regard to the location and status of the post of the CIS peacekeeping force or the interpretation of the Moscow Agreement are relevant, they should be addressed through dialogue.
Violations of the Moscow Agreement concerning the restriction of movement of United Nations military observers and the conduct of exercises by the Abkhazian military in the restricted weapons zone.
The main priorities during the 2009/10 period will be to ensure continued monitoring of the zone of conflict and the Kodori Valley and to conduct detailed investigations into all alleged violations of the Moscow Agreement.
In reality, the" peacekeeping" forces located in Abkhazia and the South Ossetia/Tskhinvali region under the Sochi/Dagomis and Moscow agreements were not trained to carry out peace missions.
The CIS peacekeeping force is aware of its responsibility for providing assistance for the security and protection of UNOMIG under the Moscow Agreement of 1994 and efforts to further streamline the modalities of this assistance will continue.
(a) To regularly patrol its area of operations, that is, the area formerly defined as the" zone of conflict" under the Moscow Agreement, on both sides of the ceasefire line, and the Kodori Valley;
The military component monitored compliance with paragraph 2(a) of the 1994 Moscow Agreement on a Ceasefire and Separation of Forces, including in accordance with resolution 1866(2009).
The Moscow Agreement is violated by random acts of deployment of prohibited weapons, mine incidents and denial of access to patrols, which continue despite protests by UNOMIG.
In the signed Yalta statement, the sides reaffirmed the pledge they made in the Moscow Agreement of 14 May 1994 and the concluding statements of the first and second Geneva meetings, concerning the non-use of force.
The members of the Council stressed the need for full observance of the Moscow Agreement on a Ceasefire and Separation of Forces as a key instrument in preventing political tension from descending into violence.
Urges the Georgian side to ensure that the situation in the upper Kodori Valley is in line with the Moscow agreement and that no troops unauthorized by this agreement are present;
After 1994, the Russian Federation had relapsed into violations not only of the Convention but also of the Sochi and Moscow Agreements that it had just signed.
The Commander of the CIS peacekeeping force subsequently claimed that the Georgian side had violated the Moscow Agreement by interfering with the CIS peacekeeping force' s freedom of movement in the conflict zone.
The presence of the latter, as well as the use of military assets, contravenes paragraph 2(d) of the 1994 Moscow Agreement, on troop withdrawal from the Kodori Valley(see S/1994/583, annex I).
The situation in the UNOMIG area of responsibility remained generally calm although unstable during the reporting period, and there were no significant violations of the Moscow Agreement.
观察到3起违反《莫斯科协定》事件:.
Violations of the Moscow Agreement observed.
必要时调查违反《莫斯科协定》的行为.
Investigations of violations of the Moscow Agreement, as required.
English
Bahasa indonesia
日本語
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt