Examples of using Lavcevic in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Lavcevic relies on the" Special Risks" provision of the main contract 1100, contained in clause 67 of the General Conditions of the main Contract 1100, in support of its claim for compensation for each element of this portion of the claim.
Lavcevic did not provide evidence to establish its claim such as detailed applications for payment,
The Panel recommends no compensation for this loss element as Lavcevic did not submit sufficient evidence and explanations to support its claim or to establish what portion of the claim, if any, related to work performed after 2 May 1990.
Assuming that Lavcevic did indeed overcome the evidentiary burden relating to its claim for the permanently imported
With respect to the claim for foodstuff, Lavcevic submitted several invoices from Centrocoop and a statement from its site manager dated 1 October 1999 indicating the value of the food left in Iraq.
The issue that arises in relation to this portion of the claim is whether Lavcevic has indeed been compensated for these amounts over the period of the contract.
Granit also provided all of the sub-sub-contracts between Granit and Lavcevic and Primorje, and correspondence between Granit and Lavcevic and Primorje, which in most cases represents the agreed position as to amounts owed by these parties to Granit.
The" E3A" Panel concluded that there was insufficient evidence that Lavcevic carried out work after 2 May 1990, or the quantity and value of such work(paragraphs 169-170).
The document appears to indicate that the amount sought by Granit from Lavcevic for work done(which is close to, but not exactly the same as, the amount sought before the Commission) relates to work
With respect to the work completed up to 30 April 1990, Lavcevic submitted a document entitled" Monthly Account for the works Performed by the Contractor in the period till 30/4/90.".
In the article 34 notification, Lavcevic was requested to submit evidence to demonstrate that it paid for the goods, proof of delivery and an explanation of what has had become of the goods in question.
In support of its claim, Lavcevic submitted a schedule of taxes and dues and various untranslated sample documents(Lavcevic states that because of the immense amount of receipts which are, in Arabic, it is only able to provide samples).
The Panel finds that Lavcevic failed to fulfil the evidentiary standard for loss of profits claims as set out in paragraphs 125 to 131 of the Summary.
These photographs were taken in June 1992 and Lavcevic states that included in the photographs are" officers of government, organisation FAO who confiscated on P-1101 the property of the companies Lavcevic…".
The Panel finds that Lavcevic submitted sufficient evidence to demonstrate its loss of foodstuff and accordingly the Panel recommends compensation in the amount of USD 128,977.
On an unspecified date(but probably in 1981), the FDSP entered into a sub-contract with, inter alia, two companies from the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia, I.L. Lavcevic-Split(" Lavcevic") and Primorje-Rijeka(" Primorje"), to construct one of the tank bases.
In support of its claim for contract losses, Granit provided extracts from the contract between the Directorate of Military Works and the FDSP, and extracts from the sub-contract between the FDSP and Lavcevic and Primorje.
In relation to the claim for work done for Lavcevic, the principal document, a letter from Lavcevic to Granit dated 12 September 1990, is confusing in translation.
Lavcevic asserts that, as a result of Iraq ' s invasion and occupation of Kuwait, work on Contract 1101 was suspended, and that consequently, Lavcevic suffered contract losses as discussed in the following paragraphs.
The Panel recommends no compensation as Lavcevic did not submit sufficient evidence to establish that its claim was within the jurisdiction of the Commission, it did not submit evidence that demonstrates a loss, and, the evidence that