Examples of using Right to submit a communication in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
the State party reaffirms its claim that the communication is inadmissible on grounds of abuse of the right to submit a communication, incompatibility ratione materiae with the Covenant,
It reiterates that the registration of communications submitted by a third party(lawyers, other persons) on behalf of individuals claiming a violation of their rights constitutes an abuse of the Committee's mandate and of the right to submit a communication, in violation of article 3 of the Optional Protocol to the Covenant.
by a third party(lawyers, other persons) on behalf of individuals claiming a violation of their rights constitutes an abuse of the mandate of the Committee and of the right to submit a communication.
the authors have abused their right to submit a communication to the Committee.
States parties to this Protocol undertake not to hinder in any way the effective exercise of the right to submit a communication and to take all steps necessary to prevent any interference with the exercise of this right or the victimization of any person or group submitting
the State party claimed that the communication constituted an abuse of the right to submit a communication inasmuch as it was submitted six years after the last domestic remedy had been exhausted
We recommend the following alternative wording:"States Parties to this Protocol undertake not to hinder in any way the effective exercise of the right to submit a communication and to take all steps necessary to ensure that individuals or groups are not subjected to persecution
which may justify such delay, the State party invites the Committee to consider the communication inadmissible on the ground that it constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication, within the meaning of article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
in reference to the Committee's Gobin v. Mauritius, the State party invites the Committee to consider the communication inadmissible as an abuse of the right to submit a communication, under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
787/1997 Gobin v. Mauritius, the State party argues that the communication is inadmissible as an abuse of the right to submit a communication under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
the optional protocol provides in article 2 that States“undertake not to hinder in any way the effective exercise of the right to submit a communication and to take all steps necessary to prevent any persecution
The Committee takes note of the State party's arguments that the communication must be declared inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol because it constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication inasmuch as it was submitted six years after the last domestic remedy had been exhausted
Question of who has the right to submit a communication.
Constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication; or.
Constitutes an abuse of the right to submit a communication; or.
The communication should not be an abuse of the right to submit a communication;
It is an abuse of the right to submit a communication; or when.
Right to submit a communication- third parties acting on behalf of alleged victims.
The persons and/or entities who have the right to submit a communication: standing requirements.