Examples of using Write-off cases in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
noted that write-off cases had been significantly reduced in closed missions.
far greater number of write-off cases could be handled at the mission level.
The Board had recommended that the review of the outstanding property write-off cases should be expedited in order to determine the accurate value of the assets which had been written off from UNTAC.
The review of outstanding property write-off cases with an inventory value of $62.6 million should be expedited to enable the value of UNTAC's assets written-off to be accurately determined(see para. 66);
The Secretariat continues to target its efforts at completing the processing of the pending contingent-owned equipment write-off cases by the end of 2002
A review of a report on UNTAC write-off cases as of 26 October 1994 produced by the Property Survey Section of the Field Administration and Logistics Division showed
convened meetings of the Local Property Survey Board on a weekly basis to facilitate the processing of write-off cases within 30 days
This modification adds clarity to the fact that only cases requiring write-off shall require full investigation.
Write-off cases reviewed and approved on a weekly basis.
One Claims Assistant helps accelerate write-off cases.
Specific aspects of the processing of contingent-owned equipment write-off cases.
Status of contingent-owned equipment write-off cases at liquidated missions as of April 2002.
It is important to note that the processing of write-off cases is different from the processing of other normal contingent-owned equipment claims.
Non-contentious Local Property Survey Board write-off cases reviewed by the Board within 2 weeks of receipt and processed within 10 days.
The contingent-owned equipment write-off cases are calculated utilizing the old reimbursement methodology.
Non-contentious write-off cases reviewed within an average of 11 days of receipt and processed within 8 days.
Processing of write-off cases: yes.
The withdrawal of gratis personnel in early 1999 severely limited the capability of the Secretariat to process contingent-owned equipment write-off cases;
The Headquarters Property Survey Board did not have the delegation of authority to review the contingent-owned equipment write-off cases.
The Service is responsible for the processing of asset write-off cases that have been referred to the Headquarters Property Survey Board.