Примеры использования Arbitral tribunal should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
which provided guidance on how the arbitral tribunal should exercise discretion.
paragraph(3), enumerated a list of factors that the arbitral tribunal should take into consideration in its determination of whether to allow a submission.
if detailed procedures were to be provided, the arbitral tribunal should be required to consult the parties before rendering its decisions on amicus curiae submissions.
It was noted that the proposal took the approach that the arbitral tribunal should be granted the authority to issue an ex parte interim measure of protection on a provisional basis and for a limited period.
Furthermore, it was stressed that any objection as to jurisdiction or composition of the arbitral tribunal should be left entirely to the parties,
It was suggested that instead of consulting the parties, the arbitral tribunal should obtain their approval for the publication
examples given under subparagraph(b) where the arbitral tribunal should take measures to limit publication,
A distinction was made with paragraph(1), under which it was said that a non-disputing Party to a treaty was potentially directly affected by issues of treaty interpretation and thus the arbitral tribunal should, under that paragraph, maintain the power to invite submissions from non-disputing Parties.
was read in conjunction with paragraph(4), which provided that the arbitral tribunal should ensure that any submission did not disrupt or unduly burden the arbitral proceedings,
in order to indicate that the arbitral tribunal should exercise its discretion to adapt the rules, with a view to ensure a fair and efficient resolution of the dispute.
the Notes should advise that parties select, or that an arbitral tribunal should advise parties to select, arbitration rules,
while making express that the arbitral tribunal should take into account the applicable law of the respondent
At its fifty-eighth session, the Working Group agreed that the arbitral tribunal should accept submissions on treaty interpretation by a non-disputing Party to the treaty, provided that any submissions would not disrupt
to state more generally that the arbitral tribunal should consider discussing with the parties the transmission of documents and other materials at the outset of proceedings, as well as
which stated that the Working Group had agreed that the arbitral tribunal should accept submissions on treaty interpretation by a non-disputing Party to the treaty, provided that such submissions would not disrupt
A view was expressed that an arbitral tribunal should wait until it became apparent that the parties would request document production so as not to artificially provoke requests,
The parties and the arbitral tribunal should bear in mind the applicable arbitration law
The Working Group considered article 1(3) as contained in paragraph 8 of document A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.169, which provided that the arbitral tribunal should exercise discretion where so permitted under the rules,
A suggestion was made that the words"In the event of a failure to constitute the arbitral tribunal" should replace the current opening words"In the absence of appointment pursuant to paragraph 1" for the reason that the power of the appointing authority to constitute the arbitral tribunal should be more broadly formulated to cover all possible failures to constitute the arbitral tribunal
Arbitral tribunals should receive appropriate guidance