Примеры использования Commentary should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The commentary should also explain how the risk of substantial harm to the fundamental interests, referred to in draft article 41(2),
It was also determined that the commentary should recognize that some nations may wish to adopt a different approach.
It was also agreed that the commentary should discuss criteria for determining the length of the transition period.
Another was that the commentary should address the merits of an approach based on the law governing the receivable.
It was agreed that the commentary should explain the term"commercially reasonable standards" giving examples.
Another suggestion was that the commentary should set out examples explaining each of the proposed alternatives.
It was also widely felt that the commentary should discuss all options and their advantages and disadvantages.
The commentary should make it clear that the category includes only a small number of universally accepted norms.
The commentary should explain how the"risk of substantial harm" should be assessed. United Kingdom.
The commentary should make it clear that such matters did not fall within the scope of the draft convention.
The commentary should include a case explaining the effects of different States taking different options regarding the recommendation on applicable law.
If article 43 uses the same terminology of"affect", the commentary should make clear the difference between the texts.
The Group of Experts therefore agreed that these revisions in both the articles and commentary should be made at least once every two years.
There was general agreement that the commentary should include a statement to clarify those matters.
Mr. FRANCIS said that in his view the commentary should take in every element,
He proposed an amendment to the effect that the commentary should clarify the matter"where appropriate.
it was agreed that the commentary should refer to recommendation 8.
The observer for Pakistan expressed the view that the use of the term"good governance" in the commentary should be avoided,
The commentary should make it clear that the immunity of the troika from compelled testimony did not arise only in cases in which a member of the troika was a defendant
It was widely felt that the recommendation or the commentary should clarify that the security right did not cease to exist,