Примеры использования Revised appropriation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
A Revised appropriation.
D Data for the biennium 1994-1995 from revised appropriation stage of unpublished source.
The proposed estimated requirements under section 39A are lower than the 1992-1993 revised appropriation by $1,254,700.
The increase in the expenditure estimates for 2004-2005 as compared with the revised appropriation for 2002-2003 is 5.8 per cent.
The overall level of the revised appropriation for the biennium 2010-2011 under this component amounted to $1,203,840,800.
Significant variances between the 1998 revised appropriation and actual expenditures are explained in the following paragraphs.
Significant variances between the 1998 revised appropriation and actual expenditures are explained in the paragraphs below.
The distribution of the projected changes and the proposed revised appropriation for the International Criminal Tribunal for Rwanda for the biennium 2004-2005 are set out in tables 1 and 2.
The distribution of resources compared with the revised appropriation for the biennium 2004-2005, by budget part, is as follows.
to reflect the related adjustments in the revised appropriation for the biennium 1998-1999 to be recommended to the General Assembly.
as compared with the revised appropriation for the biennium 2008-2009.
is in line with the 2008-2009 revised appropriation.
Table 7 illustrates the approved rates for the Swiss franc and the euro at the revised appropriation in the past decade.
The distribution of resources compared with the revised appropriation for 2010-2011, by budget part, is as follows.
Subject to the decisions of the Assembly on the revised estimates, this would have an impact on the overall revised appropriation for the biennium 2010-2011.
Adjustments to common staff costs reflect relatively little change from the rates budgeted in the revised appropriation see schedule 5.
Distribution of resources in 2012-2013 compared with the revised appropriation for 2010-2011.
Revisions made on a rolling basis at initial appropriation, revised appropriation and final appropriation stages.
In addition, actual common staff costs are projected at a higher percentage over net salaries than assumed in the revised appropriation.
The appropriation reflects a reduction in nominal terms of approximately 7 per cent as compared with the revised appropriation for the biennium 2004-2005.