Further, one of the Defendant's directors stated that he was instrumental in setting up the Defendant, and had also set up Rivertech, but denied that the Defendant and Rivertech were contract manufacturers of the Plaintiff's goods.
As a result, the litigants are seeking permission to file a new complaint with the additional allegations, i.e., demand even more reparations from the defendants who have not yet settled, and perhaps even more evidence of ongoing market rigging.
The Court took this stance after reviewing the evidence of numerous instances of mistaken identity and misdirected correspondences by customers of the Plaintiff. This shows that there was a significant risk of the public being confused into thinking that the Plaintiff was the Defendant and vice-versa.
At the same time as these developments, several eastern European émigrés groups drew up reports in defense of John Demjanjuk, and concluded on the basis of substantial evidence that no mass murder could have taken place in Treblinka and that even for this reason alone, John Demjanjuk must be innocent, as must any other accused.[30].
Critics of the International Military Tribunal, and its trial of Third Reich leaders held in Nuremberg after the Second World War, believe it was illegitimate because of its application of ex post facto laws, use of questionable evidence and false testimonies, mistreatment of defendants and witnesses, and hindrances to defense attorneys.
In addition, the Plaintiff also stated that it had commissioned various contract manufacturers, including the Defendant and a company called Rivertech Entrepreneurs("Rivertech"), to supply and produce goods under the Plaintiff's trademark. However, the Plaintiff was unaware of the Defendant's registrations as the Defendant did not obtain consent from the Plaintiff to register the same.
に対し,同被告との間で,。
Made by him with the defendants.
サドラーさん被告との間柄は?
Mr. Sadler, what is your relationship to the defendant?
Final Statement of Hermann Wilhelm Goering: The Prosecution, in the final speeches, has treated the defendants and their testimony as completely worthless.
参加者は黒人の被告と白人の被害者の裁判のビデオを見た後、被告が有罪かどうかを決定した。
The participants were shown a video of a trial of a black defendant and white victims and they had to decide whether the defendant was guilty.
English
中文
عربى
Български
বাংলা
Český
Dansk
Deutsch
Ελληνικά
Español
Suomi
Français
עִברִית
हिंदी
Hrvatski
Magyar
Bahasa indonesia
Italiano
Қазақ
한국어
മലയാളം
मराठी
Bahasa malay
Nederlands
Norsk
Polski
Português
Română
Русский
Slovenský
Slovenski
Српски
Svenska
தமிழ்
తెలుగు
ไทย
Tagalog
Turkce
Українська
اردو
Tiếng việt