Ejemplos de uso de Differences between states en Inglés y sus traducciones al Español
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
mutual understanding must have primacy for the resolution of differences between States;
the question of whether the draft articles sufficiently reflected the differences between States and international organizations,
the Chairs highlighted that a uniform allocation of two meetings for the interactive dialogue with a State party might not be meaningful in all cases in view of the differences between States parties, and advocated a degree of flexibility in that regard.
trade embargoes imposed upon Cuba, and believes that differences between States should be settled in a peaceful manner.
since expanding the scope of the study to encompass international organizations would not take into account the differences between States and international organizations
trade embargoes imposed against Cuba and believes that the differences between States should be settled in a peaceful manner.
trade embargo imposed against Cuba and believes that the differences between States should be settled through peaceful measures.
This indeed is a dangerous tendency in dealing with differences between States.
Negotiation was by far the best means of resolving differences between States.
Because environmental authorities have not yet taken into account differences between states, many laws end in noncompliance.
of practical usefulness and only raises differences between States that have no legal solution.
There are significant differences between states in the way their legal systems
A system based on equal treatment that did not take into account the profound structural differences between States was not viable.
the best way of resolving differences between States.
It would also be an indication that political differences between States did not prevent their cooperation on peaceful and humanitarian matters.
further study of the differences between States and international organizations.
Moreover, such characterization serves to fundamentally undermine the important role of the International Court of Justice in resolving legal differences between States.
It would be helpful to hear more about any procedures that existed to equalize differences between states in the application of such provisions.
The debate over the past three years, however, has highlighted key differences between States as regards therapeutic cloning
This central role of the Court as the adjudicator of contentious differences between States represents over 70 years of achievement in settling international legal disputes.