Examples of using Differences between states in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Although there could be certain inherent differences between States and international organizations,
In addition, the Commission's analysis should reflect the differences between States and international organizations
to endeavour to resolve differences between States by peaceful means and in line with international law.
trade embargoes imposed against Cuba and believes that the differences between States should be settled in a peaceful manner.
the Chairs highlighted that a uniform allocation of two meetings for the interactive dialogue with a State party might not be meaningful in all cases in view of the differences between States parties, and advocated a degree of flexibility in that regard.
and believes that differences between States should be settled in a peaceful manner.
the question of whether the draft articles sufficiently reflected the differences between States and international organizations,
mutual understanding must have primacy for the resolution of differences between States;
On this point the difference between States and international organizations seems important.
The topic“Status of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in National Legislation” was presented by Ms. Sharon Detrick who highlighted the difference between States where international treaties were considered“self-executing”,
Differences between States could lead to conflict.
A system based on equal treatment that did not take into account the profound structural differences between States was not viable.
It would also be an indication that political differences between States did not prevent their cooperation on peaceful and humanitarian matters.
Differences between states would be settled on the basis of international law from then on,
It should not be forgotten that, while there is one single set of articles on State responsibility, there exist considerable differences between States.
Moreover, such characterization serves to fundamentally undermine the important role of the International Court of Justice in resolving legal differences between States.
This central role of the Court as the adjudicator of contentious differences between States represents over 70 years of achievement in settling international legal disputes.
Given the legal and constitutional differences between States, the classification of those measures as legislative, regulatory or administrative may vary to some degree.
In its view, the religious and ideological differences between States should be taken into consideration,
Acknowledging the major differences between states in terms of legal systems,