Examples of using The committee recalled in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In case No. 1870/2009(Sobhraj v. Nepal), the Committee recalled that a criminal court may convict a person only when there is no reasonable doubt of his or her guilt, and it is for the prosecution to dispel any such doubt.
The Committee recalled that it is a subsidiary body of the General Assembly and the functions it performs to implement its mandate fully are entirely on behalf of the Assembly; they are thus core functions of the Organization.
At its eight session, the Committee recalled the importance it attached to the area of education on human rights in general, and on children ' s rights in particular,
The Committee recalled that repression of the refusal to be drafted for compulsory military service, exercised against persons whose conscience
In case No. 788/1997(Cagas et al. v. the Philippines), the Committee recalled its General Comment 8 according to which" pre-trial detention should be an exception and as short as possible"(annex IX, sect. P, para. 7.4).
The Committee recalled that the subject of multi-year payment plans had come up during its special session in 1996(see A/50/11/Add.1, para. 12) and decided to consider it at its fifty-ninth session.
The Committee recalled that, in its resolution 52/215 B, the General Assembly had requested the Committee to keep under review the procedural aspects of the consideration of requests for exemption under Article 19 of the Charter of the United Nations and to make recommendations thereon, as appropriate.
The Committee recalled the importance it attached to the area of education on human rights in general, and on children ' s rights in particular, as reflected in its second report to the General Assembly(A/49/41, paras. 425-445).
The Committee recalled that, in ratifying the Optional Protocol, Spain introduced a reservation excluding the competence of the Committee in
The Committee recalled its general mandate, under rule 160 of the rules of procedure of the General Assembly, to advise the Assembly on the action to be taken with regard to the application of Article 19 of the Charter.
The Committee recalled that it had discussed the question of annual recalculation of the scale of assessments at its fifty-seventh session and that members had had differing views on its merits.
The Committee recalled its jurisprudence according to which the effective exercise of the rights under article 14 presupposes that the necessary steps should be taken to inform the accused of the charges against him
In case No. 1390/2005(Koreba v. Belarus), the Committee recalled that accused juvenile persons are to be separated from adults and to enjoy at least the same guarantees and protection as those accorded to adults under article 14 of the Covenant.
Further, the Committee recalled its recommendation that the General Assembly encourage other Member States in arrears for the purposes of application of Article 19 of the Charter of the United Nations to consider submitting multi-year payment plans.
The Committee recalled that failure to make use of recourse procedures under the terms of anti-discrimination legislation may be a result of lack of knowledge of rights
In the absence of such special circumstances, the Committee recalled that it could not be deemed to be in the best interest of a child to eliminate altogether a parent ' s access to him or her.
In the period under review, the Committee recalled this principle in its Views on cases Nos. 778/1997(Coronel et al. v. Colombia), 836/1998(Gelazauskas v. Lithuania), 838/1998(Hendricks v. Guyana) and 908/2000(Evans v. Trinidad and Tobago).
In case No. 1432/2005(Gunaratna v. Sri Lanka), the Committee recalled its jurisprudence that article 9, paragraph 1, of the Covenant protects the right to security of the person also outside the context of formal deprivation of liberty.
The Committee recalled that even if a system of appeal is not automatic, the right to appeal under article 14,
The Committee recalled its Views on previous cases where it held that the authors had left Czechoslovakia because of their political opinions