Examples of using Free documentation in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
For instance, when we put the GNU Manifesto in a manual, or when we include a section explaining why free documentation is important,
A copy of the license is included in the section entitled"GNU Free Documentation License.
This license can be used as a free documentation license.
However, they could not endorse it in glowing terms if documentation is excluded when it is released under the GNU Free Documentation License FDL.
It seems that the GFDL is a dangerous license which does not always imply free documentation.
edited encyclopedia published using the GNU Free Documentation license.
Hans Fugal wondered if he is permitted to create a manpage from documentation that is released under the GNU Free Documentation License(FDL) and which requirements he has to meet.
it switched to the GNU Free Documentation License at the urging of Richard Stallman and the Free Software Foundation.
It is a copyleft free documentation license provided the copyright holder does not exercise any of the"LICENSE OPTIONS" listed in Section VI of the license.
For more information on free documentation, please see Richard Stallman's essay,“Free Software and Free Manuals”.
It is a copyleft free documentation license provided the copyright holder does not exercise any of the“LICENSE OPTIONS” listed in Section VI of the license.
as well as lawyers, free documentation writers, and the community at large, in writing the GFDL.
Michael Crawford summarised why the Debian community has decided that the GNU Free Documentation License is not actually a free license at all, and is starting work
The Debian project has decided that documents distributed under the GNU Free Documentation License(FDL) are considered free with regards to the Debian Free Software Guidelines(DFSG)
distribute and/or modify this document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.1 or any later version published by the Free Software Foundation with no Invariant Sections,
Branden Robinson started a survey to measure the level of consensus on whether the GNU Free Documentation License(FDL) is considered a free license according to the Debian Free Software Guidelines(DFSG) or not.
Using the GNU FDL against itself. Peter Galbraith suggested to add an invariant section to the Emacs info files that explains why documentation authors should not use the GNU Free Documentation License FDL.