Examples of using Incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty in English and their translations into Russian
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Paragraph 1, meanwhile, underlines the principle that a reservation to a treaty rule which reflects a customary norm is not ipso jure incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, even if due account must be taken of that element in assessing such compatibility.
On the question of the admissibility of reservations, a distinction must be made between reservations compatible and reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, for in the latter case the State formulating the reservation was not bound by the treaty. .
As a result, any State would be in position to formulate a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty without risking an objection,
endorsed the principle of not limiting the right to make objections to reservations to reservations considered incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
not a reservation is incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
in view of the proliferation of reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, conclusions 4 and 6 struck a
However, if a State did formulate a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, such a reservation should be considered null
Guideline 3.1.5.3 therefore sets out the principle that a reservation to a treaty rule which reflects a customary rule is not ipso jure incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, even if due account must be taken of that element in assessing such compatibility.
while silence against a reservation constituted acceptance with the sole exception of reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, silence against interpretative declaration could never give rise to any legal effects.
an international organization only if it is not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
Her delegation had supported that approach as reflecting the practice developed by some States according to which reservations incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty were severable,
consistent with the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, and not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, were permissible under international law
Some delegations maintained that a simple objection to a reservation incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty could result only in the application of the whole treaty without taking account of the reservation,of the objection.">
felt that the automatic qualification of such reservations as incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty seemed at first sight too severe.
be effective vis-à-vis the objecting State if it was not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty and was permitted or not prohibited by the treaty. .
a State may make a reservation provided it is not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.
This position offers a reasonable compromise between the underlying principle of treaty law-- mutual consent-- and the principle that reservations prohibited by the treaty or incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty are null and void.
provided such reservations are not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty, only one State party has submitted a reservation to article 17.
a reservation may be formulated by a State or an international organization only if it is not incompatible with the object and purpose of the treaty.