Examples of using NPRI data in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
plant said that NPRI data are viewed as credible by the public, so the facility often refers the public to the NPRI data when asked about emissions.
over 300 suspected neurotoxicants, of which 146 chemicals matched the TRI and NPRI data and so form the basis of the neurotoxicant analysis.
chemicals on this list, 146 chemicals matched the TRI and NPRI data and thus form the basis of the suspected neurotoxicant analysis.
ranked third in NPRI data.
TRI data from the US EPA released to the public in March 2006; NPRI data from the Environment Canada website in May 2006; and RETC data given
this chapter analyses 2002 and 2003 NPRI data and 2002 and 2003 data from the Mexican Annual Certificate of Operation(Cédula de Operación Anual-COA), Section 2.
In comparison with NPRI data, diethanolamine no longer ranks in the top 25 because the large releases of it come from non-manufacturers,
NPRI data on dioxins and furans.
The 1997 NPRI data reflect this correction.
NPRI data on the Internet, in English.
Does not include NPRI data for critieria air contaminants.
This categorization is needed to make TRI and NPRI data comparable.
How are TRI and NPRI data reflected in corporate environmental reports?
This categorization is needed in order to make TRI and NPRI data comparable.
The Canadian NPRI data for these three criteria air contaminants come from 3,122 facilities.
This definition of release is different than that used by Environment Canada with NPRI data.
NPRI data show that both release
Four reports used a variety of different methods to“normalize” the TRI or NPRI data.
Some provinces have also conducted analyses of NPRI data to establish a baseline for determining future action priorities.
the percent of NPRI data captured in the matched data set rises to 66 percent.