Examples of using Valid arbitration in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
it was suggested that it should at least be amended along the following lines:"It is deemed that the parties have concluded a valid arbitration agreement if no objection to the jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal is raised in due time.
is only applicable to cases where there is no valid arbitration agreement, not to cases where the tribunal erroneously considers not to have jurisdiction.
Although the contract did not contain a valid arbitration clause, the tribunal found that it had jurisdiction to hear the matter.
panel followed the English cases and accepted that the award debtor had the legal onus of establishing at the second stage of the enforcement process that there was no valid arbitration agreement between it and the award creditor.
an interested party was required to demonstrate the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, concerning an arbitral subject matter,
that raised problems in the case of valid arbitration agreements since, under the 1958 New York Convention
it would not be unreasonable to anticipate that some arbitrators may be reluctant to dismiss claims for lack of a valid arbitration agreement.
It found that the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement.
invoking the Polish judgment and the lack of a valid arbitration agreement.
The Court refused to make the appointment since, in its view, no valid arbitration agreement existed.
since it deemed a valid arbitration agreement to exist.
The question to be decided by the court of appeal was whether the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement, pursuant to article 7(1) MAL.
enforcement of a foreign award, in particular the defences of"lack of a valid arbitration agreement" and"violation of public policy.
that the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement.
The Court held that the parties entered into a valid arbitration agreement despite the referral to a non-existing arbitration institution since it was possible to determine through interpretation a particular arbitration institution.
The dispute arising out of a challenge of a preliminary ruling in which the arbitral tribunal confirmed its jurisdiction concerns the conclusion of a formally valid arbitration agreement on the basis of a trade usage.
should lead to a valid arbitration agreement and should be covered by the model provision.
held that it was not possible to rule on whether the parties had entered into a valid arbitration agreement according to the NYC,
The court held that there was no valid arbitration agreement pursuant to article II NYC,
is that the plea of jurisdictional immunity should not be admissible in cases where a governmental agency had entered into a valid arbitration agreement in a commercial transaction.