Voorbeelden van het gebruik van Fritz gutmann in het Engels en hun vertalingen in het Nederlands
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Computer
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Programming
The remainder of works from Fritz Gutmann's collection that were returned to the Netherlands remained in the national collection.
Fritz Gutmann', as evidenced by a certificate of inheritance executed on 18 March 2005 by Amsterdam-based public notary M.R.
Fritz Gutmann and his wife L(o)use Erika von Landau(1892-1944)
The Committee recognises two situations in which Fritz Gutmann may have lost possession of the garniture,
For instance, in three transactions, Fritz Gutmann sold a significant number of art objects to German art dealers Böhler and Haberstock during the occupation.
A carries insufficient weight to detract from the conclusion that it is highly probable that the current NK 688 was the property of Fritz Gutmann.
the property of Jewish banker and art collector Fritz Gutmann.
That it has to be assumed that Fritz Gutmann's heirs were aware of this
Applicants II also claim that Fritz Gutmann merely administered the art collection, which was part of the inheritance referred to, on behalf of the six heirs.
The request for advice of 18 April 2007 concerning the claim of the heirs of Fritz Gutmann to which this recommendation relates also concerns several other works of art.
The Committee concludes on the basis of this, that Fritz Gutmann's loss of possession of the Pietà was involuntary and due to circumstances directly related to the Nazi regime.
which shows that the purchase price was paid to Trustenad in connection with a debt that Fritz Gutmann owed it.
Applicants I contended that the current garniture was the property of Fritz Gutmann and that he lost possession of it involuntarily as a result of circumstances directly related to the Nazi regime.
The applicants stated that the current sculpture was the property of Fritz Gutmann and that he involuntarily lost possession of it as a result of circumstances directly related to the Nazi Regime.
The applicants have not provided any other sources from which it can be concluded that Fritz Gutmann was the owner of the current NK 1960 at any time before or during the war.
Eugen Gutmann's collection, which Fritz Gutmann administered, was also recovered from Germany,
void and that the heirs of Fritz Gutmann should be considered the owners of the works of art that had been sold.
In contrast to the applicants, the Committee is of the opinion that it has not been proven with any degree of probability that Fritz Gutmann owned NK 1960 at any time after 10 May 1940.
The sales contract states that Fritz Gutmann is'Eigentümer der Gegenstände'[owner of the objects]
it is impossible to ascertain whether these proceeds ever actually accrued to the heirs of Fritz Gutmann, a fact that the applicants contest