Примеры использования Removal efficiency на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Economic Assessment Panel to continue to investigate the issues raised in its 2011 progress report regarding performance criteria for destruction and removal efficiency compared to destruction efficiency,
Removal efficiencies for some techniques are given in Table 7(c) below.
Mercury removal efficiencies of flue gas cleaning systems for waste incinerators UNEP toolkit.
A/ Hg removal efficiencies increase with the proportion of ionic mercury.
Ammonia removal efficiencies of 70 per cent can be guaranteed for properly designed filters.
Example of emission control costs and removal efficiencies for coal combustion from Pacyna et al 2010.
For the roasting of sulphides, removal efficiencies of 80 to 99% for 10,000 to 200,000 m3/h units have been reported(depending on the process);
showed mercury removal efficiencies of air pollution control devices handling waste gas from the roasting furnace.
For example, the Expert Group has compiled removal efficiencies and abatement costs for some activities(refineries and cement), which may help with decisions on amendments.
e.g. mercurous chloride or hypochlorite injection scrubbers that achieve high mercury removal efficiencies.
the most widely used FGD technology, can achieve removal efficiencies as high as 99.
Higher removal efficiencies(up to 90 per cent)
As shown in the table, simple electrostatic precipitators sometimes only have very low mercury removal efficiencies.
Sulfur- and iodine-impregnated carbon adsorption systems are commonly used to reduce the mercury levels in the hydrogen gas stream if high removal efficiencies are desired.
Using the techniques mentioned above, mercury removal efficiencies vary extensively from plant to plant, as seen in table 3.
but information on removal efficiencies of mercury specifically from cement kilns is scarce.
Dry Sorbent Injection uses either a calcium or sodium based reagent for moderate to high acid gas removal efficiencies.
cyclones generally show lower dust removal efficiencies and are not considered to be BAT on their own.
cyclones generally show lower dust removal efficiencies.
It can, in general, be expected that mercury removal efficiencies in kilns may potentially be higher