Exemples d'utilisation de Equivalence and reciprocity en Anglais et leurs traductions en Français
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
arguments put forward by Australia with respect to the issue whether the conditions of equivalence and reciprocity apply to WTO Members,
pursuant to Article 19.1 of the DSU, that one way in which the European Communities could implement the above recommendation with respect to the equivalence and reciprocity conditions, would be to amend the Regulation so as for those conditions not to apply to the procedures for registration of GIs located in other WTO Members which, it submitted to the Panel, is already the case.
its GIs under Regulation(EC) No. 2081/92 without satisfying equivalence and reciprocity conditions, what was the purpose of its joint declaration with the EC concerning GIs set out in Exhibit US-6 and mentioned in paragraph
the Panel concludes that, with respect to the equivalence and reciprocity conditions, as applicable to the availability of GI protection,
it is clear that this explanation depends on the view that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions are inconsistent with the European Communities' obligations under Article III:
First, and astonishingly, the EC now claims that WTO Members do not have to satisfy the equivalence and reciprocity requirements.
Brazil submits that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions in the Regulation are inconsistent with national treatment under Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement.
Canada submits that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions in the Regulation are inconsistent with national treatment under Articles 2.1
The EC's interpretation could a contrario indicate a recognition that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions violate national treatment obligations in GATT 1994 and TRIPS.79.
By contrast, such an agreement would be useful if it meant that Switzerland did not have to meet the equivalence and reciprocity requirements in the GI Regulation.
The Panel has evaluated the European Communities' interpretation of the applicability of the equivalence and reciprocity conditions and not found it reflected in the text of the Regulation.
The parties disagree on whether the equivalence and reciprocity conditions in Article 12(1) of the Regulation apply to GIs located in other
The Panel also recalls its finding at paragraph 7.352 that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions do not apply to the right of objection by persons resident or established in WTO Members.
of the Regulation that a"third country has inspection arrangements equivalent to those laid down in this Regulation" was considered earlier as one of the equivalence and reciprocity conditions.
limited the explanation of the equivalence and reciprocity conditions to the issue of protection provided by registration to foreign names.321.
that does not satisfy the equivalence and reciprocity conditions, and the government of which does not examine and transmit an application.
7.122 Chinese Taipei submits that the equivalence and reciprocity conditions violate the national treatment obligation in Article 3.1 of the TRIPS Agreement and Article 2(1) of the Paris Convention 1967.
if there were no requirement for equivalence and reciprocity in the GI Regulation,
the Panel concludes that, with respect to the equivalence and reciprocity conditions, as allegedly applicable to objections, the United States
these aspects of the GI Regula tion- the requirement of reciprocity and equivalence and the requirement for government-level intervention- discriminate in favor of EC nationals and products