Examples of using Collusive outcome in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
the transfer of the information necessary for the purchases to the joint purchasing organisation is unlikely to lead to a collusive outcome.
By the same token, a collusive outcome is more likely among companies that will continue to operate in the same market for a long time,
this production agreement could lead to a collusive outcome between Companies A and B,
It is nonetheless possible that to circumvent the difficulties involved in achieving a collusive outcome on a large number of prices, companies may exchange information to establish simple pricing rules for example, pricing points.
the less likely it is that they will be able to achieve a collusive outcome.
this information exchange is likely to constitute an efficient mechanism for monitoring deviations from a collusive outcome, which would be likely to occur in this type of market setting.
to commonality of costs- in particular with regard to agreements not encompassing price fixing- which may result in a collusive outcome.
The exchange of historic data is unlikely to lead to a collusive outcome as it is unlikely to be indicative of the competitors' future conduct
Another scenario where commonality of costs can lead to a collusive outcome could be where the parties agree on the joint production of an intermediate product which accounts for a large proportion of the variable costs of the final product with respect to which the parties compete downstream.
This can either enable companies to achieve a collusive outcome on markets where they would otherwise not have been able to do so, or it can increase the stability of a collusive outcome already present on the market see Example 3, paragraph 107.
On the other hand, a direct limitation of competition between the parties, a collusive outcome or anti-competitive foreclosure is not likely to occur if the parties to the agreement do not have market power in the market in which the competition concerns are assessed.
A joint commercialisation agreement that does not involve price fixing is also likely to give rise to restrictive effects on competition if it increases the parties' commonality of variable costs to a level which is likely to lead to a collusive outcome.
Namely, information exchange can make the market sufficiently transparent to allow the colluding companies to monitor to a sufficient degree whether other companies are deviating from the collusive outcome, and thus to know when to retaliate.
stable oligopoly exchanging aggregated data who detect a market price below a certain level could automatically assume that someone has deviated from the collusive outcome and take market-wide retaliatory steps.
thereby facilitating a collusive outcome on the market44.
A production agreement is more likely to lead to a collusive outcome if prior to the agreement the parties already have a high proportion of variable costs in common, as the additional increment(that is to say, the production costs of the product subject to the agreement) can tip the balance towards a collusive outcome.
an exchange of individualised data would generally not be indispensable because information aggregated in for example some form of industry ranking could also generate the claimed efficiency gains while carrying a lower risk of leading to a collusive outcome see Example 4, paragraph 108.
as their object or effect the partitioning of markets between the parties or that they lead to a collusive outcome.
to a degree which enables them to achieve a collusive outcome, or if the agreement involves an exchange of commercially sensitive information that can lead to a collusive outcome.
as a result increase the likelihood that they will coordinate their behaviour in order to reach a collusive outcome but it may also make coordination easier,