Examples of using Ecthr has in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The ECtHR has taken a very similar line.
The ECtHR has taken apparently contradictory positions on the issue.
The ECtHR has forcefully condemned failures to deliver such training and instructions.
The ECtHR has held that truth is an absolute defence to a suit of defamation.
The ECtHR has generally been very firm in upholding the principle of parliamentary privilege in defamation cases.
The ECtHR has consistently held the position that associations should be able to obtain legal personality if they wish.
The ECtHR has underlined the social importance of investigating deaths during protests promptly, even if the case is complex.
Again, the role of“public watchdog” is something that the ECtHR has stressed on many occasions.
The ECtHR has underlined that the duty to investigate applies to any demonstration,"however illegal it may have been.
The ECtHR has repeatedly criticized domestic authorities for acting too quickly to end assemblies that threatened to cause traffic disruption.
The ECtHR has also criticized investigations by military prosecutors into violations human rights violations allegedly committed by others within the military hierarchy.
Acts the ECtHR has considered reprehensible include throwing rocks at the police,[3]
Similarly, the ECtHR has held that the right to freedom of association entails the right for a private association to choose its own members.
The ECtHR has stated that notification procedures are permissible"as long as they do not represent a hidden obstacle to the freedom of peaceful assembly.
The ECtHR has also frequently condemned arrests
the associations may go to Court, as the ECtHR has confirmed, even after an association is dissolved.
Although the ECtHR has not taken this step,
In the context of this provision on effective remedies, the ECtHR has already accepted that there may be security situations in which the effectiveness of remedies can be limited.
At the same time, the ECtHR has also cautioned that this principle"cannot be extended to the point that the absence of prior notification can never be a legitimate basis for crowd dispersal.
However, the ECtHR has not given general guidelines to determine whether civil rights