Примери за използване на Applicant claims на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The competent authorities of the Member State where the applicant claims to have family members and/or relatives present shall assist the competent authorities of the determining Member State with answering any questions aimed at clarifying whether the alleged family links are correct.
In support of the first plea in law, the applicant claims that a self-employed individual, even if not registered with a professional association,
The applicant claims that his“ethical veganism”, the conviction to
The applicant claims that the Fourth Board of Appeal wrongly found, in paragraphs 41, 57
The Applicant claims that external switching rates are not high for small customers,
The applicant claims that, in view of the favourable opinion of the European Food Safety Authority on the applicant's five health claims, the absolute ban on advertising resulting from the rejection of those health claims was disproportionate.
Second, the applicant claims that the contested decision is vitiated by manifest errors of facts which lead the Commission to an improper application of the law
where the applicant claims that another Member State is responsible for examining the application.
The applicant claims that in the majority of patients ALT and AST levels stabilize
As part of its observations on the objection of inadmissibility, the applicant claims an interest of its 23 members,
The Applicant claims that to the best of their knowledge(at this point in time),
It follows that, contrary to what the applicant claims, the interpretation of the mark at issue by the Board of Appeal does not call into question the fact that that mark was not claimed in specific dimensions.
In addition, the applicant claims that there has been an infringement of the principles of good administration,
In the second place, the applicant claims that the schedules of charges were adopted after the conclusion with Ryanair of the private law contracts referred to in paragraphs 4,
Secondly, the applicant claims an infringement of the principle of transparency, contrary to the well known Regulation 1049/2001 and Regulation 659/1999,(2) given that the defendant is not providing to the public the widest possible access to
In the second place, the applicant claims that the method used by the Commission to identify a margin squeeze is defective,
The applicant claims that the Council did not have the slightest evidence against it to support the reasons for including the applicant's name on the list of persons
The applicant claims that, if its action does not comply with Article 68 of the basic regulation,
The applicant claims that the construction of the Passante was financed by a tariff increase on the Tangenziale
audio-visual work in respect of which the applicant claims to hold intellectual property rights,