Examples of using Aarhus convention in English and their translations into Slovak
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Financial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Official/political
-
Computer
-
Programming
courts apply the Aarhus Convention as part of their reasoning to a decision,
As already noted,‘the public' under the Aarhus Convention can include‘one
Consistent with the Aarhus Convention, the 7th Environment Action Programme includes an objective of making information more widely
In published case law, the Aarhus Convention has been applied once, in order to redress an inconsistency in the right of appeal for non-governmental organisations(NGOs) through broadening interpretation of the applicable national law.
There are sporadic information and little information on the Aarhus Convention on government websites and this is not
of the Council26 with a view to ensuring consistency of this Directive with the 1998 Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-Making
Likewise, the second edition of the Aarhus Convention Implementation Guide is drafted in the same terms
In writing.-(SV) Junilistan supports the Aarhus Convention, but we think that the national parliaments should determine their various positions on their own account during the conference on the Aarhus Convention in Riga.
The legal definition of“public concerned” was transposed into the national Bulgarian legislation from the Aarhus Convention on Access to Environmental Information,
According to art 20 if there are any discrepancies between the treaties on the fundamental rights, as Aarhus Convention is, and the national laws,
which is by definition in the Aarhus Convention broader than the‘public concerned'.
that implements the UNECE PRTR Protocol to the Aarhus Convention[3] in the EU.
by the Espoo Convention, the Espoo-related EU legislation, the Aarhus Convention and the Aarhus-related EU legislation, and by bi-lateral agreements.
its entry into force, the Aarhus Convention is an integral part of the EU legal order
Tools to allow this were introduced into European environment law pursuant to the Aarhus Convention in particular- for example,
by the Espoo Convention, the Espoo-related EU legislation, the Aarhus Convention and the Aarhus-related EU legislation, and by bi-lateral agreements.
The Aarhus Convention provides for the possibility for Parties to establish criteria as concerns access to justice,
Background to the study is that the Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee found that the EU does not comply with the access to justice provisions of the Convention because of insufficient mechanisms to ensure review of EU acts(ACCC/C/2008/32).
The Aarhus Convention is not applied,
to EU environmental law, and draws on fundamental principles of EU law that are reflected in the provisions of the EU Treaties, the Aarhus Convention and secondary legislation as interpreted in case-law of the CJEU.