Examples of using Official codification in English and their translations into Swedish
{-}
-
Official
-
Official/political
-
Colloquial
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
-
Programming
-
Political
is merely an official codification of Directive 92/100.
to propose changes at this time, represent the part“official codification” of the attached proposal.
The objective is a straightforward consolidation(or"official codification" within the meaning of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994), without any substantive changes.
No. 1866/86 of 12 June 1986 is to undertake official codification of this type.
This text constitutes an official codification, within the meaning of the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994,
The provisions for which the Commission does not intend to propose amendments represent the“official codification” part of the proposal, while all the new provisions are clearly identified and concern the following six points.
An inter-institutional agreement was concluded in December 1994 on setting up a fast-track method of working with regard to the official codification of legislative texts but does not appear to have had much impact to date.
particularly by means of the official codification of legislative acts,
Edinburgh European Council(December 1992) confirmed this, stressing the importance of official codification as it offers certainty as to the law applicable to a given matter at a given time.
In order to incorporate them into the enacting terms of this Statute, the amendments referred to in paragraph 1 shall be subject to official codification by a European law of the Council, adopted at the request of the Court of Justice.
I fully support using the accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts in such matters.
the Commission concluded an Interinstitutional Agreement on an accelerated working method for official codification of legaislative texts(1)
In its opinion of 26 June 2003 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts stated that this proposal did indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 16 October 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 stated that the proposal in question does confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 27 February 2008 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts5 stated that the proposal in question does confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 27.9.2007 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts5 stated that the proposal referred to in point 2 confined itself to straightforward codification,
In its opinion of 11 June 2003, the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 29 September 2003 the Consultative Working Party of the Legal Services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
In its opinion of 11 May 1999 the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts2 has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.
the Consultative Working Party of the legal services set up under the Interinstitutional Agreement of 20 December 1994 on an accelerated working method for official codification of legislative texts has stated that the above proposal does indeed confine itself to straightforward codification, without any substantive changes to the acts covered by it.