Примеры использования Supervisory review на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
All the authors' supervisory review applications were duly considered and answered.
On 7 October 2009, the Supreme Court dismissed the author's application for a supervisory review of the court decisions of 27 March
An application for supervisory review is an effective remedy aimed at avoiding to the greatest extent possible instituting proceedings against citizens without justification.
On 25 September 2009, the Supreme Court dismissed the author's application for a supervisory review of the court decisions of 27 March
An application for supervisory review is an effective remedy aimed at avoiding to the greatest extent possible instituting proceedings against citizens without justification.
the author argued that the supervisory review of a decision that has already entered into force is not an effective remedy.
cassation and supervisory review proceedings.
the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, for supervisory review, which were dismissed.
The Committee noted the statistics provided to demonstrate that supervisory review was effective in a number of instances.
It also takes note of the author's explanation that his request to initiate supervisory review proceedings with the Supreme Court remained unsuccessful.
to follow all the changes in the market in order to be able to adequately undertake the supervisory review under Pillar 2.
The author also notes that the State party has not demonstrated that a prosecutor's protest motion submitted within the supervisory review procedure is indeed an effective remedy.
as well as its documentation of the supervisory review.
It also takes note that the author's request to initiate supervisory review proceedings with the Supreme Court remained unsuccessful.
The author was advised that he had a right to complain about the ruling in question through the supervisory review procedure to the higher court or to the prosecutor.
In August 1954, in the Main Military Prosecutor's Office began a supervisory review of archival materials-investigation case number 100384 of Sergei Khudyakov.
The Committee also notes the statistics provided to demonstrate that supervisory review was effective in a number of instances see para. 6.3 above.
the Committee held that supervisory review was a discretionary review process
The State party submits that the court correctly assessed that the author missed the deadline for the supervisory review appeal without any valid justification.
will document supervisory review.