Примеры использования Was declared inadmissible на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The author states that his complaint was not"examined" by the European Court of Human Rights because his application was declared inadmissible on purely procedural grounds.
Court of Human Rights, and her application was declared inadmissible on 1 December 2009.
Communication No. 26/1995(X v. Canada) was declared inadmissible under article 22, paragraph 5(a),
Accordingly, the part of the communication related to that alleged victim was declared inadmissible under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.
The author filed an extraordinary petition for review to the Supreme Court, which was declared inadmissible on 13 March 2002 for formal reasons.
in separate proceedings, was declared inadmissible by a Judgment of 25 March 1999.
the communication was declared inadmissible.
The Committee also dealt with two other communications submitted before 1 July 1996: one was declared inadmissible, the other was admitted.
the communication was declared inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
This part of the communication was incompatible with the provisions of the Covenant and was declared inadmissible under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee noted that the complainant had filed an application with the European Court of Human Rights which was declared inadmissible on 29 April 2005.
Moreover the Commission did not examine the merits of his complaint since it was declared inadmissible under article 47, paragraph(b), of the American Convention on Human Rights on the grounds that"there was
but his case was declared inadmissible on 21 February 2001 because it was not submitted within the statutory six-month time-limit.
One of these was declared inadmissible, as it was filed by the member State against itself(Costa Rica). The other,
In a case that was declared inadmissible because it had been submitted more than six months after the final decision at the national level,
Court of Human Rights, but his application was declared inadmissible ratione temporis as it was submitted over the six-month time-limit requirement.
Committee by the authors, communication No. 257/1987, was declared inadmissible on 26 July 1988 because of non-exhaustion of domestic remedies, since they had
On 17 October 2002, the author submitted an application to the European Court of Human Rights that was declared inadmissible on 7 January 2005,
degrading treatment within the meaning of article 7 of the Covenant was declared inadmissible in the Committee's admissibility decision of 20 March 1992.
One of the claims in case No. 807/1998(Koutny v. Czech Republic) was declared inadmissible on this ground, since the claim referred to events before the entry into force of the Covenant