Examples of using Declared inadmissible in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
It should be declared inadmissible as incompatible with the provisions of the Convention.
Of them, 93 complaints had been discontinued and 58 had been declared inadmissible.
However, the European Commission has declared inadmissible most complaints against Sweden as manifestly ill-founded.
D/ Application No. 13344/87, Ulusoy v. Sweden, declared inadmissible on 3 July 1989.
On 20 May 1999, the State party submits that the case should be declared inadmissible.
At its thirty-fourth session, the Committee declared inadmissible complaint No. 211/2002(P.A.C. v. Australia).
That complaint was declared inadmissible as manifestly ill-founded by the European Commission on 5 May 1993.
Accordingly, both sets of domestic proceedings remained afoot and the communication should be declared inadmissible.
In our opinion, the communication should have been declared inadmissible under article 4,
In our opinion, the communication should have been declared inadmissible under article 4, paragraph 1,
The State party further contends that the communication should be declared inadmissible as constituting an abuse of the right of submission under article 3 of the Optional Protocol.
In my view the facts of the case, albeit disputed to some extent by the parties, are clear enough to allow the conclusion that the communication should have been declared inadmissible.
Therefore, the whole communication should be declared inadmissible for failure to exhaust domestic remedies pursuant to articles 2 and 5, paragraph(2)b, of the Optional Protocol.
The Committee notes that the State party argues that the communication ought to be declared inadmissible under article 4,
It recalls that it considered that the communication should have been declared inadmissible(on grounds of lis pendens and non-exhaustion of domestic remedies); it also considered that the communication was groundless on the merits as no violation of the Covenant had occurred.
By its submission of 24 October 2007, the State party reiterated, as its main argument, that the communication ought to be declared inadmissible in the light of the reservation it had entered upon ratification to article 16, paragraph 1(g), of the Convention.
The possibility was limited to cases in which the State party was eager for the communication to be declared inadmissible and in which it could put forward sound arguments- usually failure to exhaust domestic remedies.
In case No. 845/1998(Kennedy v. Trinidad and Tobago), four members of the Committee restated that the communication should have been declared inadmissible because of the State party ' s reservation.
Although we are in agreement with the majority ' s findings in paragraphs 8.2 and 8.3 we are of the opinion that the communication should have been declared inadmissible for abuse of the right of petition and that paragraphs 8.2 and 8.3 should have been replaced by a new paragraph 8.2 drafted as follows.
State party ' s observations on admissibility 4. By submission of 17 September 2002, the State party argued that the communication should be declared inadmissible, because" the same matter" was already registered and was being examined by another international body of settlement, i.e. the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization(UNESCO), under the individual complaints procedure before the Executive Board ' s Committee on Conventions and Recommendations of UNESCO.