Examples of using To exclude or modify in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
statement cannot purport to exclude or modify the legal effect of the provisions of the Convention in their application to that State.
The European Union notes with concern that, in spite of the provisions of article 310 of the Convention, a number of States have made declarations that appear to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the Convention.
3 clarified that general rule and explained the effects of an objection to a reservation that was intended to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain treaty provisions, with examples provided in the commentary.
statement was capable of constituting a reservation if it purported to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty in their application to the State concerned.
C/ In a communication received by the Secretary-General in 1979, the Government of Trinidad and Tobago confirmed that its statement regarding article 15, paragraph 1, constituted an interpretative declaration which did not aim to exclude or modify the legal effect of the provisions of the Covenant.
The European Union once again notes with concern that, notwithstanding article 310 of the Convention, a number of States have made declarations that appear to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the Convention.
should have but a single purpose, namely, to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty as they applied to the State that made the reservation.
whose legal effect the reserving State or international organization purports to exclude or modify.
that would purport to exclude or modify the legal effect of the provisions of the Convention would be accepted,
A unilateral declaration formulated by a State or an international organization when that State or international organization expresses its consent to be bound which does not purport to exclude or modify the legal effect of the treaty in its application to that State or that international organization, or to interpret it, constitutes neither a reservation nor an interpretative declaration[and is not subject to application of the law of treaties].
such declarations and statements should not purport to exclude or modify the legal effect of the provisions of the Convention.
Mr. Choung Il Chee(Republic of Korea), referring to the draft guidelines on reservations to treaties, drew attention to guideline 1.3.3, which provided that a unilateral act" shall be presumed not to constitute a reservation except when it purports to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty or of the treaty as a whole".
Draft guideline 1.1.1, adopted by the Commission in 1998, states that a reservation purports to exclude or modify, as necessary, the legal effect" of the treaty as a whole with respect to certain specific aspects in[its] application to the State or to the international organization which formulates the reservation".
in which case it would be tantamount to a declaration purporting to exclude or modify the legal effects of the treaty,
(c) And that purports not to exclude or modify the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty(or the treaty in its entirety Regarding this point, see draft guideline 1.1.4 above.) in its application to that State or that international organization, but to clarify the meaning or scope attributed by the declarant to those provisions.
(2) In State practice it is quite common, for various reasons, to exclude or modify the application of certain provisions of a treaty in respect of a part of the territory of the State to which, in the absence of such a declaration, the provisions in question would otherwise apply.
for example, when the reservation purports to exclude or modify a provision of the treaty which, according to the intention of the parties, is necessary to safeguard the balance between the rights and obligations resulting from their consent to the entry into force of the treaty.
His understanding of the phrase that followed the word" except" was that when a unilateral statement was made with the intent to exclude or modify certain provisions of the treaty
(7) Moreover the text of article 2, paragraph 1(d), also does not appear to correspond fully to State practice with respect to reservations, in that it specifies that a reservation can purport to exclude or modify only" the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty".
And yet the text of article 2, paragraph 1(d), also does not appear to correspond fully to State practice with respect to reservations, in that it specifies that a reservation can purport to exclude or modify only" the legal effect of certain provisions of the treaty".