Examples of using Evidence in a particular case in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
recalls its jurisprudence that it is generally for the relevant domestic courts to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be ascertained that the evaluation was clearly arbitrary
reiterates that it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Covenant to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be ascertained that it was clearly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
It recalls that it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Covenant to review facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be shown that the evaluation of evidence was clearly arbitrary
not for the Committee, to evaluate the facts and evidence in a particular case, or to review the interpretation of domestic legislation,
The Committee recalls that it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Covenant to review facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be shown that the evaluation of evidence was clearly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice,
It recalls that it is generally for the courts of States parties to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be ascertained that the evaluation was clearly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice,
to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case, and that the Committee will defer to this assessment, unless it can be ascertained
reiterated that it was generally for the appellate courts of States parties to the Covenant to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case.
the Committee recalls that, according to its jurisprudence, it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Covenant to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case.
The Committee similarly holds that the appellate courts of States parties to the Covenant are responsible for the evaluation of facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it can be ascertained that the instructions to the jury were clearly arbitrary
The State party contends that while the Committee has repeatedly held that it is not in principle competent to evaluate the facts and evidence in a particular case, it should be its duty to clarify that the judicial proceedings as a whole were fair,
certain margin of appreciation, and that it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Convention to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case, unless it is found that the evaluation was clearly arbitrary or amounted to a denial of justice.
parties to the Covenant, and not for the Committee, to evaluate the facts and evidence in a particular case.
The law may be applied differently depending on available medical evidence in a particular case.
The Committee reaffirms that it is for the national courts to evaluate facts and evidence in a particular case.
It is for the national courts of the States parties to evaluate the facts and evidence in a particular case.
The Committee reiterates its jurisprudence that it is primarily for the courts of States parties to review facts and evidence in a particular case.
The Committee recalls its jurisprudence under which it is generally a matter for domestic courts to examine the facts and evidence in a particular case.
It recalls that it is generally for the courts of States parties to the Covenant to review the facts and evidence in a particular case.
It recalls that it is generally for the appellate courts of States parties to the Covenant to evaluate the facts and evidence in a particular case.