Examples of using Provisions in question in English and their translations into French
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
it is not the provisions in question that remain in force,
invalid or non-applicable, the provisions in question would be considered not to have been written without calling into question the validity of the other provisions,
It follows that there is a risk that the provisions in question may operate to the particular detriment of these workers who are,
non-applicable for any reason whatsoever, the provisions in question would be considered unwritten,
of a treaty or certain of its provisions in the context of a dispute-settlement process involving the interpretation of the treaty or the provisions in question.
One State suggested that draft article 6, paragraph 1, should take account of the exceptions contained in article 1, section F, of the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 28 July 1951 and that the provisions in question should be incorporated into draft article 6"in the form of a proviso.
also by the absence of any reference to the provisions in question in article 42.
because of challenges with how those remedies are structured, the provisions in question may not be fully realizing their objectives.
25 of the phrase“remains not in conformity with the international obligation” to state a condition of the applicability of the provisions in question.
had organized strikes to protest against the provisions in question, and it was difficult to imagine those organizations opposing efforts towards democratization.
as the provisions governing stability of container vessels were covered in the regulations referred to in article 9 and as the provisions in question had been included in the Annex to Recommendation No. 17.
which does not clearly specify the extent of the Republic of Turkey's derogation from the provisions in question, raises serious doubts as to the commitment of the Republic of Turkey to the object
The provisions in question are contained in the following Sections of the Act;
is generally sufficient during such situations and no derogation from the provisions in question would be justified by the exigencies of the situation.
is generally sufficient during such situations and no derogation from the provisions in question would be justified by the exigencies of the situation.
is generally sufficient during such situations and no derogation from the provisions in question would be justified by the exigencies of the situation.
The provision in question has not been amended.
The provision in question was not intended to allow for such restrictions.
Secondly, the provision in question must be sufficiently precise
The State party considers that it follows from this that the provision in question, namely, article 295 bis1, paragraph 3, has a legitimate objective.