TO THE THIRD QUESTION in Slovenian translation

• na tretje vprašanje
• na tretje vpra�anje
• s tretjim vpra�anjem

Examples of using To the third question in English and their translations into Slovenian

In view of the answer to the third question, it is unnecessary to reply to the fourth question..
Glede na odgovor na tretje vprašanje ni treba odgovoriti na četrto vprašanje..

In the light of the reply to the third question, it is not necessary to reply to the fourth question..
Glede na odgovor na tretje vprašanje ni treba odgovoriti na četrto vprašanje..

In the light of the answer given to the third question, there is no need to answer the fourth question..
Glede na odgovor na tretje vprašanje ni treba odgovoriti na četrto vprašanje..

In view of the answer to the first and second questions, there is no need to reply to the third question.
Glede na odgovor na prvo in drugo vprašanje na tretje vprašanje ni treba odgovoriti.

Likewise, in their view, the answer to the third question is irrelevant to the resolution of the dispute in the main proceedings.
Prav tako naj odgovor na tretje vprašanje nikakor ne bi vplival na rešitev spora o glavni stvari.

In the light of the foregoing, the answer to the third question is that Article 56 TFEU must be interpreted as meaning that.
Ob upoštevanju zgoraj navedenega je treba na tretje vprašanje odgovoriti tako, da je treba člen 56 PDEU razlagati tako, da.

I shall reply to the third question by referring to Sesar,
V odgovoru na tretje vprašanje navajam sistem SESAR,

Third, as follows from the answer to the third question,(52) the obligations flowing from the GMO Directive do not apply to(some types of) mutagenesis.
Tretjič, iz odgovora na tretje vprašanje izhaja,(52) da obveznosti na podlagi Direktive o GSO za(nekatere vrste) mutageneze ne veljajo.

Consequently, the answer to the third question is that the right of a Member State to conclude
Zato je treba na tretje vprašanje odgovoriti, da pravica države članice,

Does the answer to the third question differ in circumstances where the structure of the transactions chosen by the company in question means that the benefit of the election cannot be enjoyed?
Ali je odgovor na tretje vprašanje drugačen v okoliščinah, v katerih zaradi strukture transakcij, ki jih izbere zadevna družba, ni mogoče izkoristiti ugodnosti opcije?

Answer to your third question.
In pa odgovor na vaše tretje vprašanje.

That is part of the answer to our third question: What does God do about evil?
To je že del odgovora na moje zadnje vprašanje: kaj umetnost zmore?

If the answer to the third question is in the negative, is Directive 2000/78…
Če je odgovor na tretje vprašanje nikalen, ali je Direktiva 2000/78[…]

In the light of the answer which I propose to the third question, I think it is unnecessary to answer the fourth question..
Glede na odgovor, ki ga predlagam za tretje vprašanje, menim, da na četrto vprašanje ni treba odgovoriti.

which is in the alternative to the third question, in view of the answer it suggested to the latter question..
ki ga predlaga za tretje vprašanje, ni podala stališč v zvezi s četrtim, ki je bilo postavljeno podredno.

This brings us to the third question: who should be involved in intercultural dialogue?
To nas pripelje do tretjega vprašanja, in sicer kdo naj bo vključen v medkulturni dialog?

In light of the foregoing, the answer to the third question in Case C‑509/09 is that Article 3 of the Directive must be interpreted as not requiring transposition in the form of a specific conflict-of-laws rule.
Glede na zgoraj navedeno je treba na tretje vprašanje v zadevi C-509/09 odgovoriti, da je treba člen 3 Direktive razlagati tako, da ne zahteva prenosa v obliki posebnega kolizijskega pravila.

If the answer to the third question is affirmative, are such additives excluded from the scope of Directive 2003/96/EC by virtue of the first indent of Article 4(b) of that Directive?
Če je odgovor na tretje vprašanje pritrdilen, ali so taki dodatki izključeni iz področja Direktive 2003/96/ES zaradi prve alinee člena 4(b) te Direktive?

The answer to the third question must therefore be that processing of personal data such as that described in the reply to the first question is not covered by any of the exceptions in Article 3(2) of Directive 95/46.
Torej je treba na tretje vprašanje odgovoriti, da obdelava osebnih podatkov, kakršna je obdelava iz odgovora na prvo vprašanje, ne spada pod nobeno od izjem iz člena 3(2) Direktive 95/46.

In the light of those observations the answer to the third question must be that in the framework of the common system of VAT, national tax authorities are obliged to respect the principle of protection of legitimate expectations.
Glede na vse predhodne ugotovitve je treba na tretje vprašanje odgovoriti, da morajo nacionalni davčni organi v okviru skupnega sistema DDV spoštovati načelo varstva legitimnega pričakovanja.