Examples of using Was not submitted in English and their translations into Arabic
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Political
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Also reaffirms paragraph 15 of its resolution 56/293, regrets that the report requested in paragraph 10 of its resolution 57/318 was not submitted at its fifty-eighth session, and decides to consider it at its fifty-ninth session;
The MI transformed this proposal into an amendment to the relevant electoral laws in 2010. However, this amendment was not submitted to the government due to changes in the government and the continuing fundamental observations of certain ministries.
(b) To inform the above-mentioned organizations that, if their report was not submitted by 2 August 1996, the Committee would take appropriate action, which could result in a change in their status or its suspension or withdrawal;
Although the second contract was sent to the local contract committee for advice, the third was not submitted to the committee, despite the fact that the combined payment to the contractor required such advice.
24 of the Covenant, since the communication was not submitted on behalf of the author ' s children, which makes it inadmissible under article 1 of the Optional Protocol.
The procuring entity may dismiss the application if it decides that the application is manifestly without merit, was not submitted within the deadlines set out in paragraph(2) of this article, or if the applicant is without standing.
(2) The Committee regrets that the initial report of the State party was not submitted in 1990, which has prevented the Committee from assessing the implementation of the provisions of the Convention by the State party since its ratification of that instrument nearly 25 years ago.
have not been exhausted, since the application for amparo was not submitted before the deadline established by law.
The Sudan should like to point out that this text has not entered into force, as it was not submitted to the Parliament at the session before last.
procedural treatment that would apply to a claim which was not submitted to the insolvency proceeding, but rather a matter to be addressed under other relevant national laws.
In these countries, it has been reported that applications for conscientious objector status tend to be almost automatically accepted, unless there is a disqualifying condition, a formal requirement lacking in the application or the application was not submitted within applicable time limits.
The Committee observes that information on the use of the resources in the support account during the past calendar year was not submitted as required in accordance with paragraph 6 of General Assembly resolution 49/250.
As to the complaint relating to article 14, paragraph 3(c), of the Covenant, the Committee observes that, as asserted by the State party, the complaint of undue delay in the proceedings was not submitted to the domestic courts.
The author applied to the European Court of Human Rights on 5 August 2000, but his case was declared inadmissible on 21 February 2001 because it was not submitted within the statutory six-month time-limit.
The Committee notes with concern that the fourth periodic report of the State party was not submitted in timely manner and not prepared in accordance with the reporting guidelines of the Committee.
decides that the application is manifestly without merit, the application was not submitted within the deadlines set out in paragraph 2 of this article or the applicant is without standing.
It pointed to the need to address the consequences if a claim was not submitted within the specified time limit. It referred to
By submission dated 16 February 1998, the State party contends that the communication should be declared inadmissible since it was not submitted by the author himself, but by counsel on his behalf.
The note would also indicate that, in case the report was not submitted within six months, the Committee would appoint one of its members to prepare a report on the implementation of the Covenant in the State party concerned on the basis of all reliable information available, for consideration by
UNFPA further informed the Board that it had revised the letter of separation for staff members in March 2012 with a requirement that all education grant claims should be submitted prior to the date of separation, and that if the claim was not submitted, the full amount of the advance would be recovered from the staff members ' final pay.