Examples of using Likelihood of confusion in English and their translations into Polish
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Financial
-
Official/political
-
Programming
-
Computer
marks EL COTO and COTO DE IMAZ- Relative ground for refusal- Likelihood of confusion- No damage to reputation- Article 8(1)(b) and(5) of Regulation(EC) No 40/94.
Community trade mark- Opposition proceedings- Application for the Community figurative mark l'Altra Moda- Earlier national figurative mark Alba Moda- Relative ground for refusal- No likelihood of confusion- Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation(EC) No 40/94- Article 73 and Article 74(1) and(2) of Regulation No 40/94.
there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association between the sign and the trade mark;
Although, when examining an opposition under Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trademark by the proprietor of the earlier trade mark, the distinctive character of that mark must be taken into account when assessing the likelihood of confusion, it is only one factor among others involved in that assessment.
the reputation of the earlier mark, MEZZOMIX, it cannot be held that there is a likelihood of confusion between, on the one hand,
notice of opposition to registration of the contested trade mark, pleading that there was a likelihood of confusion within the meaning of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 with the earlier German word marks CASTELLUM and CASTELLUCA, designating goods in Class 33 of the Nice Agreement.
If, in such a context, the third party could rely on the requirement of availability to use a sign which is nevertheless similar to the trade mark freely without the proprietor of the latter being able to oppose that use by pleading likelihood of confusion, the effective application of Article 5(1) of the Directive would be undermined.
Court of First Instance(ThirdChamber) of 16 May 2007- Trek Bicycle vOHIM- Audi(ALLTREK), Case T-158/05 Community trade mark-Opposition proceedings- Application for the Community word mark ALLTREK- Earlier national word mark TREK- Relative ground for refusal- No likelihood of confusion- No similarity of goods- Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation(EC) No 49/04.
Judgment of the Court of First Instance(Second Chamber) of 12 June 2007- Assembled Investments(Proprietary) vOHIM- Waterford Wedgwood(WATERFORD STELLENBOSCH), CaseT-105/05 Community trade mark-Opposition proceedings- Application for the figurative Community mark WATERFORD STELLENBOSCH- Earlier Community word mark WATERFORD- Relative ground for refusal- No likelihood of confusion- Absence of similarity between the goods- Absence of complementarity- Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation(EC) No 40/94.
For the average German consumer, there is no likelihood of confusion for the purposes of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 40/94 on the Community trademark between the figurativemark containing the word element‘castellani', registration of which as a Community trademark is sought in respect of‘alcoholic beverages except beer,
Whereas the Commission has carefully considered the actual likelihood of confusion;
It is now necessary to consider whether, overall, there is a likelihood of confusion between the opposing marks.
OHIM and the intervener contend that the Board of Appeal was fully entitled to find that a likelihood of confusion exists.
According to settled case-law, a likelihood of confusion exists if the public might believe that the goods in question come from the same undertaking
that the Board of Appeal made a fair assessment of the likelihood of confusion between the goods in question.
a form of protection whose implementation does not require the existence of a likelihood of confusion.
in accordance with the procedure laid down in Article 15, having regard to traditional fair practice and of the actual likelihood of confusion.
is shared by the conflicting marks, it submits that a likelihood of confusion is established also with regard to those other earlier marks.
mark of weak distinctive character, there may be a likelihood of confusion on account, in particular, of a similarity between the signs