Examples of using Primary and secondary rules in English and their translations into Spanish
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
that of State responsibility, one relating to the distinction between primary and secondary rules and the second emphasizing duties of prevention and“due care”,
to try to force them into a single matrix was to transgress the distinction between primary and secondary rules of responsibility on which the text as a whole was founded.
While the distinction between primary and secondary rules has served its purpose in the field of State responsibility,
rule,">which is really on the borderline between primary and secondary rules". Statement by B. Simma at the forty-ninth session of the International Law Commission A/CN.4/SR.2513, p. 8.
infringes the distinction between primary and secondary rules is article 35,
The Special Rapporteur stated that his concern had been to situate the idea of consent within the framework of the distinction between primary and secondary rules, which had been made in Chapter V. He noted that some members did not consider article 29 as relating to the issue of consent given in advance in a treaty,
Primary and secondary rules.
The distinction between primary and secondary rules has had its critics.
The question of"primary" and"secondary" rules.
Distinction between“primary” and“secondary” rules of State responsibility.
The distinction between primary and secondary rules, it was suggested, also affected the relationship between responsibility and wrongfulness.
The distinction between“primary” and“secondary” rules was imperfect and sometimes difficult to draw.
The distinction between“primary” and“secondary” rules was formulated by Special Rapporteur Ago as follows.
Romania supported the distinction between“primary” and“secondary” rules, and believed that the latter should be codified.
especially the distinction between primary and secondary rules.
Lastly, on the subject of the"self-contained regime", the Commission's members seemed to agree on the difficulty of differentiating between primary and secondary rules.
First, there was an imbalance between the codification of primary and secondary rules that could in the long term be detrimental to the coherence of international law.
The view was also expressed that international law could not be placed in watertight compartments of“primary” and“secondary” rules.
Whatever the inspiration for the distinction between primary and secondary rules as employed by the Commission may be, it does not rest on a clear jurisprudential foundation.
In contrast, the view was expressed that the distinction between primary and secondary rules was intellectually tempting, but rather artificial,