Примери за използване на Contested mark на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
and may be directed against a part or the totality of the goods or services in respect of which the contested mark is applied for.
and towards the applicant of the contested mark(the defendant) and, also, the possible absence of a likelihood of confusion.
by means of safeguards limiting the exclusive right of the proprietor of the contested mark, without requiring cancellation of that mark
The descriptive character of the contested mark for‘bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use;
Alter the contested decision in so far as it declared the invalidity of the contested mark for‘massage oils,
dealing with the link between the contested mark and the remaining goods
In support of its application, Hanssen Beleggingen submits that, as a result of a chain of transfers of the contested mark, it has become the actual proprietor of the rights to the contested mark. .
The Green Effort acquired rights over the word mark Formula E(‘the contested mark'), the application for registration of which was filed on 17 November 2010 pursuant to Regulation No 207/2009.
Ms Prast-Knipping secured the transfer of the contested mark into her name on 14 November 2003.
By decision of 10 August 2012, the Cancellation Division of OHIM partially granted that application and declared the invalidity of the contested mark for‘bleaching preparations and other substances for laundry use; soaps;
proof of genuine use of the contested mark within a period of three months.
The link between the contested mark and the goods and services it covers therefore forms part of the legal considerations having decisive importance in the context of a decision relating to the descriptive character of a mark. .
By decision of 30 June 2014, the Cancellation Division revoked the contested mark in respect of all of the goods for which it had been registered,
which seeks recognition that the contested mark does not belong to Ms Prast-Knipping due to the existence of private agreements providing for the transfer of the mark to Hanssen Beleggingen.
distinctive character of the contested mark.
Accordingly, the insufficient reasoning in the decision of 8 February 2016 with regard to a link between the contested mark and the remaining goods and services should have led the applicant,
since whisky was a different product and nothing in the contested mark contained a potentially misleading
The applicant has itself acknowledged, in particular in connection with its arguments relating to the descriptive character of the contested mark, that the word‘hot' has several meanings,
is extraneous to the question of the validity or registration of the contested mark.
the General Court found that the‘essential characteristics' of the contested mark consisted of, on the one hand,