Примери за използване на Referring court на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
(19) By contrast, according to the referring court, in Croatia there are no systemic flaws within the meaning of the second subparagraph of Article 3(2) of Regulation No 604/2013.
However, the referring court has requested the interpretation of that provision only in the event that the Court answers the first question referred in the affirmative.
The following conclusions can be drawn from this analysis as regards the circumstances listed by the referring court.
It is for the referring court to assess whether those conditions are satisfied in the case in the main proceedings.
In accordance with the national procedural rules, the agreement in question was submitted for approval to the referring court.
Kanal 5 and TV 4 brought an action before the referring court against STIM under the second paragraph of Article 23 KL.
Lastly, the referring court asks whether the display of a broadcast on a screen also constitutes reproduction.
By that question, the referring court asks, in essence, whether Articles 17 EC
The referring court considers that, in view of the importance of the Community law principle of equal treatment, it is not appropriate to interpret the recitals to the Directive broadly.
The referring court should keep the registry informed of any action taken
The registry liaises with the referring court during the proceedings and sends it copies of all procedural documents
It is for the referring court to ascertain whether that is the case in the dispute in the main proceedings'.
On 9 August 2003 Ms Möser lodged an application with the referring court to set aside that decision.
As that appeal was dismissed by decision of 26 June 2002 Mr Kahveci challenged that decision before the referring court.
The referring court believes that the obligation to publish under Article 44a of Regulation No 1290/2005 constitutes an unjustified interference with the fundamental right to the protection of personal data.
On that point, I recall that the referring court considers, rightly in my view, that all of the abovementioned criteria are satisfied in circumstances such as those of the main proceedings.
In that regard, it is apparent that the referring court sets out grounds that undeniably indicate that there is a need to make a ruling urgently.
I note, as the referring court, easyJet and the Commission have done,
The referring court must justify the urgency,
The question from the referring court is, in reality,